Opinion Opinion articles provide a forum for expression of views, and responses to previous statements, on a range of topical, emerging and controversial issues.

See all article types »

Dissecting the WRKY Web of Plant Defense Regulators

  • Thomas Eulgem
  • Published: November 24, 2006
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020126

During the past ten years, a large body of circumstantial evidence has accumulated, implicating WRKY factors in transcriptional reprogramming during plant immune responses [13]. Encoded by complex gene families in higher plants [4], these transcription factors share a DNA-binding domain (WRKY domain) comprising approximately 60 amino acids [5]. Additional conserved features of WRKYs are limited to separate subgroups of this family and include putative leucine zippers, nuclear localization signals, calmodulin binding sites, and several domains of unknown function [57]. Multiple studies have demonstrated the ability of WRKYs to bind to promoters of defense-associated genes via specific interactions of their WRKY domains with pathogen response elements termed W boxes (TTGACC/T) [811]. Both activating and repressing effects of WRKYs and W boxes on transcription have been observed [1214]. It has also been shown that stable and transient overexpression of several WRKYs in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) conveys enhanced resistance to various bacterial or fungal pathogens [1517].

The majority of the 74 Arabidopsis WRKY genes are transcriptionally inducible upon pathogen infection and other defense-related stimuli [18,19]. Interestingly, WRKY promoters are typically enriched for W boxes, thereby pointing to the existence of intricate regulatory circuits wherein functionally interconnected members of this family reside [19]. Indeed, multiple studies have revealed interactions of WRKYs with either their own promoters or those of other family members, suggesting that these transcription factors extensively engage in auto- and cross-regulation [9,12,13,20]. Such a WRKY web may ensure fast and efficient signal amplification. It may also allow for a tighter control in limiting the extent of defense responses via negative feedback mechanisms.

A central component of the transcriptional network activated during immune responses in Arabidopsis is Nonexpresser of Pathogenesis-Related genes 1 (NPR1) [21]. This transcriptional cofactor is required for several different types of plant immune responses, including basal defense and systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which are dependent on the defense hormone salicylic acid (SA) [22]. Upon induction of basal defense or SAR, NPR1 is translocated from the cytosol to the nucleus where it mediates the binding of TGA basic leucine zipper protein transcription factors to their cognate promoter elements, resulting in the upregulation of a multitude of genes [2328]. In addition, NPR1 is functionally linked to WRKYs during plant immune responses. Intriguingly, WRKYs control NPR1 expression on the one hand, while on the other hand seem to operate downstream from it [17,29,30]. Until now, the identity of WRKYs involved in NPR1-dependent signaling branches has for the most part remained a mystery.

In contrast to WRKYs, NPR1 and TGA basic leucine zipper proteins are members of small families of only six and ten members in Arabidopsis, respectively. While mutant analyses have clearly proven the roles of NPR1 and several defined TGA basic leucine zipper proteins in pathogen defense [3133], such direct genetic evidence is scarce for WRKYs. With the exception of an atypical family member (AtWRKY52/RRS1) [34], no WRKYs have been found to be involved in plant immune responses by mutant screens or other forward genetics approaches. In many cases, reverse genetics–based strategies to reveal biological roles of individual WRKYs using sequence-indexed Arabidopsis transferred DNA (T-DNA) or transposon insertion mutants have also proved to be unsuccessful in revealing defense-related phenotypes [2]. Functional redundancy among structurally related WRKY family members has been partially blamed for these experimental shortcomings [7]. In addition, in vivo roles of individual WRKYs may be limited to defined branches or nodes of the defense network. Hence, elimination of their function by mutation may result in quite specific or subtle phenotypes. Therefore, a major challenge in dissecting the WRKY web appears to be accurately pinpointing each WRKY's sphere of activity prior to mutant analyses. This would narrow the choice of defense phenotypes to examine and may allow for the selection of appropriate candidates for double or higher-order mutant analyses.

In a study published in this issue of PLoS Pathogens, Wang et al. succeeded in applying such a strategic approach [35]. A cleverly designed microarray experiment uncovered several WRKY genes that are direct transcriptional targets of NPR1. Wang and colleagues profiled transcriptome changes in transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing an NPR1-GR (glucocorticoid receptor) fusion protein in an npr1 mutant background. Combined application of SA and the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone activated the NPR1 pathway and triggered translocation of NPR1-GR to nuclei. By simultaneously blocking protein biosynthesis with cycloheximide, Wang and colleagues eliminated transcription of indirect NPR1 targets (see also [36]). Among transcripts that are directly upregulated by NPR1-dependent mechanisms they found eight encoding WRKYs. Subsequent analysis of known npr1 phenotypes using single and double T-DNA mutants of most of these candidates confirmed their roles in NPR1 signaling.

These experiments established AtWRKY18 as a positive regulator of basal defense and SAR operating downstream from NPR1. Two previous studies had already implicated this family member in basal defense [7,16]. Overexpression of AtWRKY18 in both studies supported its role as a positive defense regulator. However, findings by Xu et al. using the same wrky18 insertion allele as Wang and colleagues (SALK_093916) suggest that it represses basal defense [7]. This discrepancy may have arisen from differences in experimental conditions. Also, protein–protein interaction studies have suggested that a complex interplay between AtWRKY18 and two structurally related family members, AtWRKY40 and AtWRKY60, modulates their function [7]. These three WRKYs can form homodimers or heterodimers via N-terminal leucine zippers, a feature conserved among them. Differential formation of different types of WRKY dimers may widen the spectrum of AtWRKY18 functions and may allow this regulator to act both as an activator and repressor of defense reactions.

Additional direct targets of NPR1 examined by Wang et al. are AtWRKY53, AtWRKY54, and AtWRKY70. These three WRKYs are structurally closely related to each other and distinct from AtWRKY18. While the AtWRKY54 and AtWRKY70 proteins show the highest degree of sequence similarity, the AtWRKY53 and AtWRKY70 genes exhibit strongly correlated expression during SAR. None of the single mutants of these three genes examined by Wang and colleagues showed altered disease resistance. However, combined insertions in the coexpressed AtWRKY53 and AtWRKY70 genes resulted in a moderate but significant reduction of basal defense to virulent Pseudomonas syringae bacteria, suggesting partially overlapping functions of these two genes. Consistent with this finding, recent studies by Li et al. as well as Knoth et al. have demonstrated roles of AtWRKY70 in SA-mediated basal defense to the biotrophic fungus Erysiphe cichoracearum and the oomycete Hyaloperonospora parasitica, respectively [37,38]. The study by Knoth et al. extended roles of this WRKY to SA-dependent gene-for-gene resistance [38]. In addition, AtWRKY70 was also shown to be required for defense to the fungal necrotroph Botrytis cinerea [39]. Although resistance to necrotrophs is typically mediated by SA-independent signaling mechanisms, AtWRKY70 appears to be transcriptionally upregulated by an SA-dependent pathway in response to B. cinerea infections. Hence, a common theme regarding the function of AtWRKY70 seems to be its requirement for SA-mediated defenses.

Furthermore, Wang and coworkers found that AtWRKY70 contributes to a second NPR1-mediated function, which is suppression of SA accumulation [35]. In untreated Arabidopsis tissues, SA concentrations are low but increase to high levels after pathogen infection. NPR1 limits the extent of SA accumulation. The tested wrky70 single mutant exhibited markedly enhanced levels of SA in untreated plants. This effect is more pronounced in a wrky70/wrky54 double mutant, which also allowed SA to accumulate to an even higher level after pathogen infection. Hence, the structurally closely related AtWRKY70 and AtWRKY54 have overlapping roles in counteracting accumulation of SA.

Finally, Wang et al. established a role of the so far elusive AtWRKY58 as a negative regulator of SAR [35]. In summary, the strategy applied by Wang and colleagues proved to be extremely successful in providing a deeper insight into the roles of WRKYs operating directly downstream from NPR1 in SA-dependent transcriptional cascades. This strategy can be modified and reiterated for a stepwise dissection of additional layers in the plant defense signaling network. Intriguingly, members of the Xinnian Dong lab have already initiated experiments to identify direct transcriptional targets of AtWRKY18 [35].


I thank Colleen Knoth and Yu-Hung (Linda) Wei for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions.


  1. 1. Rushton PJ, Torres JT, Parniske M, Wernert P, Hahlbrock K, et al. (1996) Interaction of elicitor-induced DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J 15: 5690–5700.
  2. 2. Ulker B, Somssich IE (2004) WRKY transcription factors: From DNA binding towards biological function. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 491–498.
  3. 3. Eulgem T (2005) Regulation of the Arabidopsis defense transcriptome. Trends Plant Sci 10: 71–78.
  4. 4. Zhang Y, Wang L (2005) The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol Biol 5: 1.
  5. 5. Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE (2000) The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 5: 199–206.
  6. 6. Park CY, Lee JH, Yoo JH, Moon BC, Choi MS, et al. (2005) WRKY group IId transcription factors interact with calmodulin. FEBS Lett 579: 1545–1550.
  7. 7. Xu X, Chen C, Fan B, Chen Z (2006) Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 18: 1310–1326.
  8. 8. Rushton PJ, Reinstadler A, Lipka V, Lippok B, Somssich IE (2002) Synthetic plant promoters containing defined regulatory elements provide novel insights into pathogen- and wound-induced signaling. Plant Cell 14: 749–762.
  9. 9. Turck F, Zhou A, Somssich IE (2004) Stimulus-dependent, promoter-specific binding of transcription factor WRKY1 to its native promoter and the defense-related gene PcPR1–1 in parsley. Plant Cell 16: 2573–2585.
  10. 10. Maeo K, Hayashi S, Kojima-Suzuki H, Morikami A, Nakamura K (2001) Role of conserved residues of the WRKY domain in the DNA-binding of tobacco WRKY family proteins. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 65: 2428–2436.
  11. 11. Yamasaki K, Kigawa T, Inoue M, Tateno M, Yamasaki T, et al. (2005) Solution structure of an Arabidopsis WRKY DNA binding domain. Plant Cell 17: 944–956.
  12. 12. Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Schmelzer E, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE (1999) Early nuclear events in plant defence signalling: Rapid activation by WRKY transcription factors. EMBO J 18: 4689–4699.
  13. 13. Robatzek S, Somssich IE (2002) Targets of AtWRKY6 regulation during plant senescence and pathogen defense. Genes Dev 16: 1139–1149.
  14. 14. Lebel E, Heifetz P, Thorne L, Uknes S, Ryals J, et al. (1998) Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controlling PR-1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant J 16: 223–233.
  15. 15. Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, et al. (2002) MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 415: 977–980.
  16. 16. Chen C, Chen Z (2002) Potentiation of developmentally regulated plant defense response by AtWRKY18, a pathogen-induced Arabidopsis transcription factor. Plant Physiol 129: 706–716.
  17. 17. Li J, Brader G, Palva ET (2004) The WRKY70 transcription factor: A node of convergence for jasmonate-mediated and salicylate-mediated signals in plant defense. Plant Cell 16: 319–331.
  18. 18. Kalde M, Barth M, Somssich IE, Lippok B (2003) Members of the Arabidopsis WRKY group III transcription factors are part of different plant defense signaling pathways. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16: 295–305.
  19. 19. Dong J, Chen C, Chen Z (2003) Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol Biol 51: 21–37.
  20. 20. Cormack RS, Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Kochner P, Hahlbrock K, et al. (2002) Leucine zipper-containing WRKY proteins widen the spectrum of immediate early elicitor-induced WRKY transcription factors in parsley. Biochim Biophys Acta 1576: 92–100.
  21. 21. Dong X (2004) NPR1, all things considered. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 547–552.
  22. 22. Pieterse CM, Van Loon LC (2004) NPR1: The spider in the web of induced resistance signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 456–464.
  23. 23. Zhou JM, Trifa Y, Silva H, Pontier D, Lam E, et al. (2000) NPR1 differentially interacts with members of the TGA/OBF family of transcription factors that bind an element of the PR-1 gene required for induction by salicylic acid. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15: 191–202.
  24. 24. Zhang Y, Fan W, Kinkema M, Li X, Dong X (1999) Interaction of NPR1 with basic leucine zipper protein transcription factors that bind sequences required for salicylic acid induction of the PR-1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 6523–6528.
  25. 25. Despres C, DeLong C, Glaze S, Liu E, Fobert PR (2000) The Arabidopsis NPR1/NIM1 protein enhances the DNA binding activity of a subgroup of the TGA family of bZIP transcription factors. Plant Cell 12: 279–290.
  26. 26. Kinkema M, Fan W, Dong X (2000) Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. Plant Cell 12: 2339–2350.
  27. 27. Mou Z, Fan W, Dong X (2003) Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Cell 113: 935–944.
  28. 28. Thibaud-Nissen F, Wu H, Richmond T, Redman JC, Johnson C, et al. (2006) Development of Arabidopsis whole-genome microarrays and their application to the discovery of binding sites for the TGA2 transcription factor in salicylic acid-treated plants. Plant J 47: 152–162.
  29. 29. Yu D, Chen C, Chen Z (2001) Evidence for an important role of WRKY DNA binding proteins in the regulation of NPR1 gene expression. Plant Cell 13: 1527–1540.
  30. 30. Maleck K, Levine A, Eulgem T, Morgan A, Schmid J, et al. (2000) The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nat Genet 26: 403–410.
  31. 31. Cao H, Bowling SA, Gordon AS, Dong X (1994) Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 6: 1583–1592.
  32. 32. Delaney TP, Friedrich L, Ryals JA (1995) Arabidopsis signal transduction mutant defective in chemically and biologically induced disease resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 6602–6606.
  33. 33. Zhang Y, Tessaro MJ, Lassner M, Li X (2003) Knockout analysis of Arabidopsis transcription factors TGA2, TGA5, and TGA6 reveals their redundant and essential roles in systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 15: 2647–2653.
  34. 34. Deslandes L, Olivier J, Theulieres F, Hirsch J, Feng DX, et al. (2002) Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in Arabidopsis thaliana is conferred by the recessive RRS1-R gene, a member of a novel family of resistance genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 2404–2409.
  35. 35. Wang D, Amornsiripanitch N, Dong X (2006) A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathog 2(11): e123.. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0020123.
  36. 36. Wang D, Weaver ND, Kesarwani M, Dong X (2005) Induction of protein secretory pathway is required for systemic acquired resistance. Science 308: 1036–1040.
  37. 37. Li J, Brader G, Kariola T, Palva ET (2006) WRKY70 modulates the selection of signaling pathways in plant defense. Plant J 46: 477–491.
  38. 38. Knoth C, Ringler J, Dangl J, Eulgem T (2006) Arabidopsis WRKY70 is required for full RPP4-mediated disease resistance and basal defense against Hyaloperonospora parasitica. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. In press.
  39. 39. AbuQamar S, Chen X, Dhawan R, Bluhm B, Salmeron J, et al. (2006) Expression profiling and mutant analysis reveals complex regulatory networks involved in Arabidopsis response to Botrytis infection. Plant J 48: 28–44.