Research Article

Structural Basis for Feed-Forward Transcriptional Regulation of Membrane Lipid Homeostasis in Staphylococcus aureus

  • Daniela Albanesi equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Daniela Albanesi, Georgina Reh

    Affiliations: Institut Pasteur, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale (CNRS UMR 3528), Paris, France, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR), Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

  • Georgina Reh equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Daniela Albanesi, Georgina Reh

    Affiliation: Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR), Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

  • Marcelo E. Guerin,

    Affiliations: Unidad de Biofisica, Centro Mixto CSIC-UPV/EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain, Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, Spain, IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain

  • Francis Schaeffer,

    Affiliation: Institut Pasteur, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale (CNRS UMR 3528), Paris, France

  • Michel Debarbouille,

    Affiliation: Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif (CNRS ERL 3526), Paris, France

  • Alejandro Buschiazzo,

    Affiliation: Institut Pasteur, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale (CNRS UMR 3528), Paris, France

    Current address: Unit of Protein Crystallography, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.

  • Gustavo E. Schujman,

    Affiliation: Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR), Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

  • Diego de Mendoza mail, (DdM); (PMA)

    Affiliation: Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR), Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

  • Pedro M. Alzari mail (DdM); (PMA)

    Affiliation: Institut Pasteur, Unité de Microbiologie Structurale (CNRS UMR 3528), Paris, France

  • Published: January 03, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003108


The biosynthesis of membrane lipids is an essential pathway for virtually all bacteria. Despite its potential importance for the development of novel antibiotics, little is known about the underlying signaling mechanisms that allow bacteria to control their membrane lipid composition within narrow limits. Recent studies disclosed an elaborate feed-forward system that senses the levels of malonyl-CoA and modulates the transcription of genes that mediate fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis in many Gram-positive bacteria including several human pathogens. A key component of this network is FapR, a transcriptional regulator that binds malonyl-CoA, but whose mode of action remains enigmatic. We report here the crystal structures of FapR from Staphylococcus aureus (SaFapR) in three relevant states of its regulation cycle. The repressor-DNA complex reveals that the operator binds two SaFapR homodimers with different affinities, involving sequence-specific contacts from the helix-turn-helix motifs to the major and minor grooves of DNA. In contrast with the elongated conformation observed for the DNA-bound FapR homodimer, binding of malonyl-CoA stabilizes a different, more compact, quaternary arrangement of the repressor, in which the two DNA-binding domains are attached to either side of the central thioesterase-like domain, resulting in a non-productive overall conformation that precludes DNA binding. The structural transition between the DNA-bound and malonyl-CoA-bound states of SaFapR involves substantial changes and large (>30 Å) inter-domain movements; however, both conformational states can be populated by the ligand-free repressor species, as confirmed by the structure of SaFapR in two distinct crystal forms. Disruption of the ability of SaFapR to monitor malonyl-CoA compromises cell growth, revealing the essentiality of membrane lipid homeostasis for S. aureus survival and uncovering novel opportunities for the development of antibiotics against this major human pathogen.

Author Summary

An opportunistic Gram-positive pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus is a major threat to humans and animals, being responsible for a variety of infections ranging from mild superficial to severe infections such as infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis and sepsis. The increasing resistance of S. aureus against most current antibiotics emphasizes the need to develop new approaches to control this important pathogen. The lipid biosynthetic pathway is one appealing target actively pursued to develop anti-Staphylococcal agents. Despite its potential biomedical importance, however, little is known about the signaling mechanisms that allow S. aureus to control its phospholipid content. In order to shed light on this fundamental mechanism, we studied S. aureus FapR (SaFapR) a transcription factor that senses the levels of malonyl-CoA, a key intermediate in fatty acid biosynthesis, and modulates the expression of genes involved in fatty acid and phospholipid biosynthesis. Our studies of SaFapR uncovered the mechanistic basis of a complex biological switch that controls membrane lipid homeostasis in S. aureus. We also discovered that disruption of the ability of SaFapR to recognize malonyl-CoA, the ligand that controls SaFapR binding to DNA, compromises S. aureus viability, thus revealing new opportunities for the development of antibiotics against this major human pathogen.


The cell membrane is an essential structure to bacteria. It primarily consists of a fluid phospholipid bilayer in which a variety of proteins are embedded. Most steps involved in phospholipid biosynthesis are therefore explored as targets for designing new antibacterial drugs [1]. The central events in the building of phospholipids enclose the biosynthesis of fatty acids, which are the most energetically expensive lipid components, by the type II fatty acid synthase (FASII) on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, and subsequent delivery of the latter to the membrane-bound glycerol-phosphate acyltransferases (Fig. S1). Due to the vital role of the membrane lipid bilayer, bacteria have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to finely control the expression of the genes responsible for the metabolism of phospholipids [2].

Transcriptional regulation of bacterial lipid biosynthetic genes is poorly understood at the molecular level. Indeed, the only two well-documented examples are probably those of the transcription factors FadR and DesT, which regulate the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively. FadR was discovered as a repressor of the β-oxidation regulon [3], [4] and subsequently found to also activate the transcription of fabA and fabB, two essential genes for the biosynthesis of UFA [5][7]. Binding of FadR to its DNA operator is antagonized by different long-chain acyl- CoAs [8][11], in agreement with the proposed structural model [12][14]. DesT is a TetR-like repressor that primarily controls the expression of the desCB operon, which encodes the components of an oxidative fatty acid desaturase, and secondarily controls the expression of the fabAB operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [15]. DesT binds either saturated or unsaturated acyl-CoAs, which respectively prevent or enhance its DNA-binding properties [16], thus allowing the repressor to differentially respond to alternate ligand shapes [17].

Among the known regulatory mechanisms that control lipid synthesis in bacteria, the Bacillus subtilis Fap system is unique in that the regulated final products, fatty acids and phospholipids, are controlled by a metabolite required at the beginning of the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway, malonyl-CoA [18], [19]. To monitor the levels of this metabolite, bacteria employ the FapR protein [20], which is highly conserved among several Gram-positive pathogens. FapR has been shown to globally repress the expression of the genes from the fap regulon (Fig. S1) encoding the soluble FASII system as well as two key enzymes that interface this pathway with the synthesis of phospholipid molecules [18].

Like most transcriptional regulators in bacteria, FapR is a homodimeric repressor [20]. Each protomer consists of a N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD) harboring a classical helix-turn-helix motif connected through a linker α-helix (αL) to a C-terminal effector-binding domain (EBD). We have previously determined the structure of a truncated form of FapR from Bacillus subtilis (BsFapR), which included the linker α-helix and the EBD but lacked the DBD [20]. The EBD folds into a symmetric dimer displaying a ‘hot-dog’ architecture, with two central α-helices surrounded by an extended twelve-stranded β-sheet. A similar fold has been found in many homodimeric acyl-CoA-binding enzymes [21], [22] involved in fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism [23], [24]. However, the bacterial transcriptional regulator FapR appears to be so far the only well-characterized protein family to have recruited the ‘hot-dog’ fold for a non-enzymatic function.

The structure of truncated FapR bound to malonyl-CoA revealed structural changes in some ligand-binding loops of the EBD, and it was suggested that these changes could propagate to the missing DNA-binding domains to impair their productive association for DNA binding [20]. However, the actual mechanisms involved remain largely unknown in the absence of detailed structural information of the full-length repressor and its complex with DNA. Here, we report the structural characterization of full-length FapR from Staphylococcus aureus (SaFapR), a major Gram-positive pathogen causing severe human infections [25][27]. The crystal structures of SaFapR have been obtained for the protein alone and for the complexes with the cognate DNA operator and the effector molecule, malonyl-CoA, providing important mechanistic insights into the mode of action of this transcriptional regulator. We further demonstrate that structure-based SaFapR mutants interfering with malonyl-CoA binding are lethal for S. aureus. These data show that membrane lipid homeostasis is essential for S. aureus survival and highlights this regulatory mechanism as an attractive target to develop new antibiotics.


FapR senses malonyl-CoA and regulates lipid biosynthesis in S. aureus

The S. aureus fap regulon is organized as in B. subtilis [18], except for two missing genes (yhfC and fabHB) (Table S1). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that SaFapR binds to its own promoter (PfapR) and that malonyl-CoA specifically disrupts the repressor-operator complex (Fig. S2). Furthermore, the unlinked genes plsX and fabH from the fap regulon are upregulated in two distinct S. aureus strains lacking the repressor (Fig. S3A) and SaFapR is able to complement a B. subtilis fapR mutant strain (Fig. S3B). These results clearly demonstrate that SaFapR conserves the same regulatory function originally described for the B. subtilis orthologue [20].

The SaFapR-DNA complex

The crystal structure of SaFapR in complex with a 40-bp oligonucleotide comprising the PfapR promoter was determined at 3.15 Å resolution (Table 1). Two SaFapR homodimers were observed to bind to a single DNA molecule in the crystal (Fig. 1A). This observation is in agreement with isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) studies of protein-DNA interactions, which showed a complex isotherm with a large exothermic component and two distinct binding reactions (Fig. 1B). Sequence analysis of the promoters of the fap regulon from B. subtilis [18] and S. aureus (Fig. S4) revealed the presence of a conserved inverted repeat. Our previous DNAse I footprinting analyses performed with BsFapR on both strands of the B. subtilis fapR promoter demonstrated that this symmetric element covers half of the DNAse protected region [20]. Interestingly, this region corresponds to the recognition site of one SaFapR homodimer in the crystal, suggesting a sequential mechanism of binding. Indeed, a sequential binding model fits well the observed isotherm (Fig. 1B), indicating that the two SaFapR homodimers bind the operator with nanomolar dissociation constants of 0.5±0.1 nM for the first and 51±8 nM for the second binding reactions. In the crystal structure of the complex, however, the two SaFapR homodimers are related by a local two-fold symmetry axis, and the DNA molecule is bound in a 50:50 orientation, as confirmed by determining the crystal structure of SaFapR in complex with an asymmetrically Br-labelled oligonucleotide using the Br anomalous scattering signal (data not shown).


Figure 1. Overall structure of the SaFapR-operator complex.

(A) Surface representation of the DNA operator (in red) with two bound FapR homodimers looking down the non-crystallographic two-fold symmetry axis. For one homodimeric repressor (in yellow and orange) the DNA-binding domains (DBDs), the linker helix αL and the dimeric effector-binding domain (DBD) are indicated. (B) ITC study of SaFapR binding to the PfapR operator at 25°C. The top panel shows the raw heat signal for 6 µl injections of a 68 µM solution of SaFapR dimer into a 4 µM solution of the 40 bp DNA oligonucleotide (curve 1 obtained by subtraction of the SaFapR dilution energy curve 3 from the raw titration curve 2). The bottom panel shows the integrated injection heats after normalization fitted with a sequential binding model. Two SaFapR dimers bind the operator, with parameters (Kd,I = 0.5±0.1 nM, ΔH°I = −22.5±0.2 kcal/mol, TΔS°I = −9.8±0.2, kcal/mol) and (Kd,II = 51±8 nM, ΔH°II = −6.95±0.2 kcal/mol, TΔS°II = 3.0±0.3 kcal/mol).


Table 1. Data collection, phasing and refinement statistics.


Each protein homodimer exhibits an elongated asymmetric conformation in the crystal structure, in which the two DNA-bound DBDs are structurally detached from the central dimeric ‘hot-dog’ EBD. Indeed, the positioning of the EBD (stabilized by crystal packing contacts) relative to the DBD-DNA complex requires partial unwinding of the C-terminal end of αL, as confirmed by comparing the structures of the ligand-free and DNA-bound forms of SaFapR (see below). The amphipatic linker helix αL plays a major role in stabilizing the molecular architecture of the SaFapR-DNA complex. Helix αL interacts with αL′ from the second protomer mainly through its exposed hydrophobic face (including residues Ile59, Val62 and Ala63; Fig. S5A). This dimerization region is further stabilized by hydrophobic contacts (Phe26) and hydrophilic interactions between αL and the α1–α2 connecting loop from both DBDs. In addition, the guanidinium group of Arg59 gets engaged in electrostatic interactions with the main-chain carbonyl groups of Pro25 and Ile27, and the hydroxyl group of Tyr67 is within hydrogen bonding distance to the main-chain of Ser23 at the end of α1′ on the second protomer (Fig. S5A). Altogether this contact network largely contributes to the correct relative positioning of the two helix-turn-helix motifs on the DNA major groove.

The two DBDs from the asymmetric homodimer interact in a similar manner with DNA. The recognition helix α3 from the helix-turn-helix motif penetrates the double-helix major groove and makes extensive interactions with the two DNA chains (Fig. 2A). The SaFapR-DNA interface mainly involves the DNA backbone phosphates (Fig. 2B), except for base-specific interactions of Gln41 (from the recognition helix α3) in the major groove and Arg56 (from the linker helix αL) in the minor groove. Importantly, the insertion of the guanidinium groups of this arginine from both protomers promotes the opening of the minor groove, inducing a pronounced local bending of DNA (Fig. 2C). The two phosphate-contacting residues from helix α1 (Lys10 and Arg13), as well as residues from the recognition helix α3 and the C-terminal half of the linker helix αL (which include most other DNA-contacting residues) are highly conserved in the entire FapR protein family (Fig. S6), indicating a conserved mode of DNA-binding. The N-terminus of the protein (preceding helix α1) faces the adjacent minor groove in the crystal structure (Fig. 2A), suggesting that it could be engaged in additional DNA interactions. However, this region is poorly conserved in the FapR protein family and is disordered in the crystal structure.


Figure 2. SaFapR-DNA interactions.

(A) Promoter recognition by the SaFapR DNA-binding domain. Protein residues making hydrogen-bonding interactions with specific bases (Gln41, Arg56) or with the phosphate backbone are indicated. The DNA double-helix is depicted in solvent accessible surface representation and colored according to the mapped electrostatic potential (negative charge in red, positive in blue). (B) Schematic representation of protein-DNA hydrogen-bonding interactions for one FapR homodimer. Protein residues involved in base-specific hydrogen-bonding interactions are colored red and those involved in phosphate hydrogen-bonding interactions are blue; the specifically recognized bases are orange. In the crystal structure, the DNA duplex exists 50:50 in the two possible orientations, and the figure shows the 5′ to 3′ sequence covering the 17 bp palindromic sequence (−8 to +8) conserved in promoters of the fap regulon. The non-crystallographic two-fold axis relating the two FapR homodimers in the crystal structure is indicated by the green arrow. (C) Schematic view of the DNA conformation within the FapR–DNA complex. Each base pair is represented by a single block, and the dark-shaded side indicates the minor groove. The actual base-step parameters are reported in Table S2.


Structure of the repressor-effector complex

The crystal structure of full-length SaFapR in complex with malonyl-CoA, determined at 1.9 Å resolution (Table 1), revealed a different, more compact conformation of the repressor. Most notably, the two amphipatic linker helices αL, instead of interacting with each other as in the DNA-bound repressor, now bind to either side of the central dimeric EBD (Fig. 3A). This results in a protein conformation with the two helix-turn-helix domains far apart from each other, corresponding to an incompetent DNA-binding state. Interactions of helix αL with the lateral face of the EBD play a major role in stabilizing the observed quaternary organization of the protein, mainly through extended hydrophobic contacts between aliphatic and aromatic side chains (Fig. 3B). In addition, several hydrogen bonding and salt bridge interactions (Fig. S5B) lock a well-defined structure for the loop connecting helix αL to the first β-strand of the EBD (residues 70–82), which further restrict the mobility of αL and contrasts with the loose asymmetric conformation observed for this loop in the DNA-bound SaFapR homodimer (Fig. 1A).


Figure 3. Overall structures of the malonyl-CoA-bound forms of SaFapR.

(A) Cartoon showing the structure of the SaFapR-malonyl-CoA homodimer in two different views. The first protomer is shown in green; the second protomer is shown in blue (the helix-turn-helix motif - in dark blue - was partially visible in the electron density map but was not included in the final model due to high protein mobility). Bound malonyl-CoA is shown in surface representation. (B) Closer view of the interactions between the central hot-dog fold (electrostatic surface representation) and the linker helix (green). Hydrophobic side chains involved in inter-domain interactions are labeled. (C) Electron density map of malonyl-CoA and protein-ligand interactions. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines and protein residues from each protomer are colored green and yellow respectively.


The phosphopantetheine and malonyl groups of malonyl-CoA are well defined in the electron density map (Fig. 3C). The phosphopantetheine group binds within a tunnel at the interface between the two protomers in the SaFapR homodimer, and adopts the same conformation as observed in many acyl-CoA-binding proteins displaying the hot-dog fold [20], [24]. This binding mode results in the complete occlusion of the ligand malonate from the bulk solvent. The charged carboxylate group of malonate is neutralized through a salt bridge with the guanidinium side-chain of Arg110, and makes additional hydrogen bonding interactions with the main-chain nitrogen from Gly111 and the side-chain of Asn119′ from the second protomer (Fig. 3C). The engagement of Arg110 in malonyl-CoA-binding triggers a local reorganization of hydrogen-bonding interactions (Fig. S5B) and surface reshaping that further stabilize the loop connecting αL to the first β-strand of the hot-dog fold in the non-productive conformation (Fig. 3A), thus preventing DNA binding. On the other hand, the adenosine 3′-phosphate moiety of malonyl-CoA is largely exposed to the solvent (it is partially disordered in one of the two protomers) and makes no specific contacts with the protein. This implies that SaFapR specifically recognizes the malonyl-phosphopantetheine moiety of the ligand, in agreement with the observation that either malonyl-CoA or malonyl-acyl carrier protein (malonyl-ACP) can indistinctly function as effector molecules [28].

A detailed comparison of the malonyl-CoA complexes between full-length SaFapR and the truncated form of BsFapR (lacking the DBDs) revealed a conserved structural arrangement of the EBD core, and ligand binding promoted the same conformation of the connecting loop αL-β1 (Fig. S7). On the other hand, helix αL displays a different organization, due in part to the absence of the DBDs. This helix protrudes away from the EBD core in BsFapR to get involved in crystal packing contacts [20]. Interestingly, hydrophobic residues engaged in these inter-domain interactions are largely invariant in the whole FapR family (Fig. S6), as are also key residues involved in electrostatic interactions (Fig. S5). Altogether, the structural alignment indicates not only an identical mode of malonyl-CoA binding but also the conservation of the DBD – αL – EBD interactions required to stabilize the FapR-malonyl-CoA complex as visualized in the SaFapR model.

The overall structure of SaFapR

The crystal structure of full-length SaFapR in the absence of ligands has been obtained in two different crystal forms (Table 1). Interestingly, in three out of four crystallographically independent protomers the repressor has the same non-productive quaternary arrangement as observed in the structure of malonyl-CoA-bound SaFapR, with helix αL bound to the lateral face of the EBD (Fig. 4A), strongly suggesting that this compact structure likely represents a conformation of the protein in solution. However, the helix-turn-helix motifs display high temperature factors or even partial disorder, and are engaged in extensive crystal contacts, suggesting the coexistence of alternative conformational states in solution characterized by flexible DBDs. In that sense, in one protomer of the crystal form 2 (Table 1) both helix αL and its associated DBD are highly flexible and could not be modeled, suggesting a marginal stability of the observed quaternary arrangement. Moreover, the first visible residues of this same monomer (positions 72–77, connecting helix αL with the first β-strand of the EBD) adopt a conformation that differs from that observed in the other ligand-free or malonyl-CoA-bound protomers, but resembles that found for one subunit of the asymmetric DNA-bound form of the repressor (Fig. 4B).


Figure 4. The structures of the SaFapR homodimer in the absence of ligands display distinctive features of either the malonyl-CoA-bound or the DNA-bound forms of the repressor.

(A) Structural superposition of the ligand-free repressor in two different crystal forms (green and cyan) with the malonyl-CoA-bound form (yellow), revealing a similar quaternary organization. Bound malonyl-CoA is shown as solid spheres. Note that helix αL and its attached DBD are flexible (not modeled) in one monomer of the ligand-free repressor (in cyan, at right). (B) Superposition of this same monomer (magenta) with an equivalent subunit from the malonyl-CoA-bound (cyan) and the DNA-bound (yellow) forms of the repressor. The EBD region (grey molecular surface) is identical for all three monomers. The loop connecting helix αL with the first β-strand of the EBD in the ligand-free subunit (residues 72–76) has the same conformation as observed in the DNA-bound structure. In both panels, the arrow indicates the first visible residue (Ser72) of the subunit with a disordered helix αL.


Ligand-induced structural transition

The structure of SaFapR in complex with the DNA operator revealed a strikingly different overall conformation of the protein, compared to those of the ligand-free and the effector-bound repressor. As highlighted by the crystal structures described above, the transitional switch between the relaxed (DNA-bound) and tense (malonyl-CoA-bound) forms of the repressor involves a large-scale structural rearrangement (Fig. 5). The amphipathic helix αL, whose hydrophobic face binds to the protein core in the tense state (Fig. 5A), structurally dissociates and moves >30 Å to interact with the same helix from the other protomer and with DNA in the relaxed state (Fig. 5B). This DNA-driven process requires partial unwinding of the linker helix αL and the solvent-exposure of hydrophobic side-chains from the EBD (Leu82, Ile83, Val85, Ile94, Val123) and from the loop immediately following helix αL (Ile70, Phe78) in both protomers. Such a substantial conformational rearrangement between the tense and relaxed states (Fig. 5C) contrasts with the more subtle structural changes observed for other well-studied bacterial classes of allosteric transcriptional regulators such as the tetracycline [29] or lactose [30] repressors, illustrating that specific physiological responses can be achieved by a variety of mechanisms.


Figure 5. The transitional switch between the relaxed and tense states of the repressor involves a significant rearrangement of the DBDs.

(A) SaFapR in complex with malonyl-CoA (shown in stick representation), tense state. (B) SaFapR in complex with DNA, relaxed state in which the amphipathic helix αL from each protomer associates with each other. (C) Superposition of the two conformational states of the repressor illustrating the structural transition. Solvent accessible surfaces are shown in transparent to highlight the DNA-induced dissociation of the invariant effector-binding domain from the DBDs. The molecules are shown in light (relaxed) and dark (tense) grey, except for the helices from one DBD (colored).


Disruption of membrane lipid homeostasis is lethal for S. aureus

Bacterial FASII has been identified as a promising target for antibacterial drug discovery. Nevertheless, Brinster et al [31] have questioned the feasibility of this approach in Gram-positive pathogens based on the finding that FASII is not essential in Streptococcus agalactiae if the bacterium is supplemented with fatty acids or human serum. This controversy was recently clarified by Parsons et al [32], who showed that externally added fatty acids downregulate the activity of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase in some Gram-positive pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae. This biochemical mechanism suppresses the malonyl-CoA levels allowing fatty acid supplements to replace endogenous fatty acids completely, thus rescuing bacterial FASII inhibition. In S. aureus, this feed-back regulatory mechanism is not present [32] and thus external fatty acids do not circumvent the treatment of this bacterium with FASII inhibitors. These results and the regulatory properties of the acc genes led the authors to propose that pathogens containing FapR would likely be sensitive to FASII inhibitors, regardless of the addition of external fatty acids [32]. These considerations prompted us to test if structure-based mutations predicted to disrupt the SaFapR-malonyl-CoA interaction are lethal for S. aureus even in the presence of extracellular fatty acids. To this end, based on the structural information and on our previous work [20], we substituted Arg110 by alanine to disrupt the key interaction with the malonyl carboxylate, and introduced a double substitution (Gly111Val, Leu132Trp) to block the ligand-binding tunnel that accommodates the phosphopantetheine moiety in the repressor-effector complex (Fig. 3C). These mutants were expected to retain their DNA-binding capacity and to permanently repress the expression of the fap regulon, independently of the metabolic conditions. To test this prediction we engineered S. aureus fapR null mutants to produce the protein variants in response to an inducer (IPTG). IPTG-induced expression of SaFapRR110A caused a small drop in cell viability (data not shown), while cells expressing SaFapRG111V,L132W failed to grow (Fig. 6). A variety of fatty acids, including oleic acid, a common mammalian fatty acid, and anteiso saturated fatty acids, the most abundant acyl chains found in S. aureus phospholipids were unable to overcome the growth inhibition caused by the expression of the superrepressor SaFapRG111V,L132W in S. aureus (Fig. 6). These results clearly show that disruption of the membrane lipid homeostasis mimics the effects of FASII inhibitors in S. aureus strongly supporting the notion that exogenous fatty acids cannot replace the endogenously produced acyl chain in this bacterium [32].


Figure 6. Expression of the SaFapRG11V, L132W superrepresor is lethal for S. aureus and fatty acid supplementation cannot overcome growth inhibition.

The figure shows the growth of strain RN4220ΔfapR expressing SaFapRG11V, L132W (REH117) or SaFapRWT (REH118) under the tight inducible PspacOid promoter on THA plates in the absence or presence of 10 mM IPTG. Identical results were obtained for strain REH117 growing in 10 mM IPTG when supplemented with either Tween80 (0.1%) or 500 µM of the following fatty acids: palmitic acid (16:0), oleic acid (18:1), 16:0+18:1, anteiso 17:0 (a17:0), a15:0+a17:0, or 18:0+a17:0.



The structures of SaFapR, in three relevant states of its regulation cycle, uncover a complex biological switch, characterized by completely different protein-protein interactions involving in all cases the linker helix αL and so leading to a distinct quaternary arrangement.for the tense and relaxed states of the repressor (Fig. 5). Similarly to other homodimeric proteins studied by single-molecule or NMR relaxation approaches [33], [34], our crystallographic studies suggest that the two conformational states of SaFapR (i.e. with EBD-bound or EBD-detached DBDs) can be populated in the ligand-free repressor species. Thus, a higher cellular concentration of malonyl-CoA would not only trigger the conformational changes that disrupt the SaFapR-operator complex [20], but would also promote the dynamic shift of the ligand-free repressor population towards the tense state.

Our results highlight the ability of FapR to monitor the levels of malonyl-CoA and appropriately tune gene expression to control lipid metabolism, ensuring that the phospholipid biosynthetic pathway will be supplied with appropriate levels of fatty acids either synthesized endogenously or incorporated from the environment. Bacterial FASII is a target actively pursued by several research groups to control bacterial pathogens [35]. A controversy surrounding FASII as a suitable antibiotic target for S. aureus was based on the ability of this pathogen to incorporate extracellular fatty acids [36]. This apparent discrepancy was recently clarified by showing that although exogenous fatty acids indeed are incorporated by S. aureus, following its conversion to acyl-ACP, they cannot deplete the generation of malonyl-CoA and malonyl-ACP [32]. Thus, these fatty acid intermediates release FapR from its binding sites [28] and are used by FASII to initiate new acyl chains. Thus, when a FASII inhibitor is deployed against S. aureus, the initiation of new acyl chains continues leading to depletion of ACP, which is correlated with diminished exogenous fatty acids incorporation into phospholipids [32]. Strikingly, SaFapR, not only control the expression of the FASII pathway, but also regulate the expression of key enzymes required for phospholipid synthesis such as PlsX and PlsC [18], [37]. Most of the Gram-positive pathogens rely on the PlsX/PlsY system to initiate phospholipid synthesis by converting acyl-ACP to acyl-P04 by PlsX followed by the transfer of the fatty acid to the 1 position of glycerol-PO4 by the PlsY acyltransferase [37], [38]. A strength of targeting these steps in lipid synthesis is that acyltransferases inhibition cannot be circumvented by supplementation with extracellular fatty acids. Thus, targeting of lipid synthesis with compounds that block the expression of PlsX in S. aureus cannot be ignored, specially taking into account that it has been reported that extracellular fatty acids increase the MIC for FASII inhibitors in this important pathogen. [32], [39]. In this sense, the unique mode of action of FapR and our encouraging in vivo results validate lipid homeostasis as a promising target for new antibacterial drug discovery in Gram-positive bacteria.

Conserved in many Gram-positive bacteria, FapR is a paradigm of a feed-forward-controlled lipid transcriptional regulator. In other characterized bacterial lipid regulators it is the long acyl-chain end products of the FASII pathway that act as feedback ligands of lipid transcriptional regulators [40]. The effector-binding domains of these proteins, such as E. coli FadR [12] or the TetR-like P. aeruginosa DesT [17], frequently display an α-helical structure with a loose specificity for long-chain acyl-CoA molecules, possibly because the permissive nature of helix-helix interactions provide a suitable platform to evolve a binding site for fatty acid molecules of varying lengths. In contrast, a high effector-binding specificity is required for the feed-forward regulation mechanism of the FapR repressor family [19], which entails the recognition of an upstream biosynthetic intermediate, namely the product of the first committed step in fatty acid biosynthesis. This high specificity is achieved in SaFapR by caging the charged malonyl group inside a relatively stiff internal binding pocket, and may be the reason why the hot-dog fold was recruited for this function. Nevertheless, it could be expected that, in organisms using the FapR pathway, a complementary feed-back regulatory loop should also operate at a biochemical level, for instance by controlling the synthesis of malonyl-CoA [37]. This would imply that lipid homeostasis in FapR-containing bacteria would be exquisitely regulated by feed-back and feed-forward mechanisms, as it is indeed the case in higher organisms ranging from Caenorhabditis elegans to humans [41].

Materials and Methods

In vivo studies

In frame fapR deletion mutants of S. aureus strains RN4220 and HG001 [42], RN4220ΔfapR and HG001ΔfapR respectively, were constructed and the expression level of the plsX and fabH genes, belonging to the fap regulon, was analyzed by real time PCR as described in Text S1. To evaluate the activity of the S. aureus repressor in B. subtilis, we used the ΔfapR mutant strain GS416 that contains a PfabHB-lacZ reporter fusion and expressed S. aureus fapR from the xylose inducible PxylA promoter (for further details see Text S1).

Mutants SaFapRR110A and SaFapRG111V,L132W, impaired in malonyl-CoA binding were obtained by site-directed mutagenesis using S. aureus RN4220 genomic DNA as template, mutagenic oligonucleotides and overlap-extension PCR. The replicative vector pOS1 [43] and the tight IPTG-regulated PspacOid promoter from pMUTIN4 were used for ectopical expression of fapR alleles in RN4220ΔfapR (see Text S1). S. aureus transformants were selected in THA plates supplemented with cloramphenicol (5 µg/ml) and expression of fapR alleles was achieved by addition of 10 mM IPTG. To evaluate the effect of an external source of fatty acids THA plates were supplemented with 500 µM of the stated fatty acids or 0.1% Tween80 (Fig. 6).

Protein expression and purification

The S. aureus fapR gene was cloned into the pET15b vector (Novagen) as described in Text S1 and expressed in E. coli BL21/pLysS. Bacterial cultures were grown in LB supplemented with ampiciline 100 µg/ml and chloramphenicol 10 µg/ml at 37°C until OD600 0.6. Expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at 20°C for 17 hours. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C, and protein-containing fractions from a Ni2+-affinity chromatography on a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) were dialyzed overnight against an excess volume of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 300 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT at room temperature, in the presence of a 1/40 (w/w) ratio of His-tagged TEV protease. After dialysis, a second affinity chromatography step was performed in the presence of 20 mM imidazole, the flow through was concentrated and injected into a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 prep grade column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, and 300 mM NaCl. After gel filtration SaFapR was dialyzed at room temperature against 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6 and 50 mM NaCl, concentrated to 15 mg/ml and stored in aliquots at −80°C for further use. Selenomethionine (SeMet)-labeled SaFapR was obtained using the E. coli strain B834 (Novagen) grown in M9 medium containing 0.2 g/l selenomethionine and purified as above.

Crystallographic studies

Crystals of the repressor and its complexes with the effector and operator molecules were obtained as described in Text S1. All diffraction datasets were collected from single crystals at 100 K using synchrotron radiation at beamlines ID14.4 and ID29 (European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France) or Proxima 1 (SOLEIL, Saint-Aubin, France). Data were processed with either XDS [44] or iMosflm [45] and scaled with XSCALE from the XDS package or SCALA from the CCP4 suite [46]. The crystal structures of SaFapR alone and its complex with malonyl-CoA were solved by molecular replacement methods using the program AMoRe [47] and the effector-binding domain of B. subtilis FapR (PDB entry 2F41) as the search model. In all cases, the missing DNA-binding domains were manually traced from sigma A-weighted Fourier difference maps. The structure of the repressor-operator complex was solved by a combination of molecular replacement and single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) techniques using SeMet-labeled SaFapR. The selenium substructure was determined with the program SHELXD [48] and further refined with the program SHARP [49]. Structures were refined with REFMAC5 [50] or BUSTER [51] (for the SeMet-labeled protein-DNA complex) using a TLS model and non-crystallographic symmetry restraints when present, alternated with manual rebuilding with COOT [52]. Models were validated through the MolProbity server [53]. Data collection and refinement statistics are reported in Table 1. Graphic figures were generated and rendered with programs Pymol [54] and 3DNA [55].

Isothermal titration calorimetry

ITC experiments were performed using the high precision VP-ITC system (MicroCal Inc., MA) and quantified with the Origin7 software provided by the manufacturer. All molecules were dissolved in 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl and the binding enthalpies were measured by injecting the SaFapR solution into the calorimetric cell containing the 40 bp DNA solution. Heat signals were corrected for the heats of dilution and normalized to the amount of compound injected. Complementary DNA strands were heated to 90°C and annealed by a stepwise decrease to 25°C followed by 30 min on ice prior to use; DNA concentration was determined by absorption at 260 nm.

Accession codes

Crystallographic coordinates and structure factors were deposited in the Protein Data Bank, with accession codes 4a0x, 4a0y, 4a0z and 4a12.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Fatty acid synthesis and phospholipid initiation steps in Bacillus subtilis. The FabH condensing enzymes initiates the cycles of fatty acid elongation by condensation of acyl-CoA primers with malonyl-ACP (3a). The resultant β-ketoester is reduced by the β-ketoacyl-ACP reductase (4). Then, the β-hydroxyacyl-ACP is dehydrated to the trans-2 unsaturated acyl-ACP by β-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydrase (5), which is finally reduced by enoyl reductase (6). Subsequent rounds of elongation are initiated by the elongation-condensing enzyme FabF (3b) to generate an acyl-ACP two carbons longer than the original acyl-ACP at the end of each cycle. The long chain acyl-ACP end products of fatty acid synthesis are transacylated in three steps to glycerolphosphate, to generate phosphatidic acid (PA), a key intermediate in the synthesis of phospholipids. First, PlsX catalyzes the synthesis of fatty acylphosphate from acyl-ACP (7); then, PlsY transfers the fatty acid from the activated acyl intermediate to the 1-position of glycerol-3P (8) and finally, lyso-PA is acylated to PA by PlsC (9). Malonyl-CoA is generated from acetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA carboxylase (1) and then is transferred to ACP by malonyl-CoA transacylase (2). Expression of the genes surrounded by shaded ellipses is repressed by FapR, whose activity is, in turn, antagonized by malonyl-CoA (enclosed in a rectangular box). R denotes the terminal group of branched-chain or straight-chain fatty acids.



Figure S2.

Effect of malonyl-CoA and short-chain acyl-CoA thioesters on binding of SaFapR to PfapR. (A) Electrophoretic shift assay showing the binding of SaFapR to PfapR. Increasing amounts of SaFapR were incubated with 30 nM of double strand PfapR probe (left panel) or non-specific DNA (right panel). (B) Effect of malonyl-CoA on SaFapR binding to PfapR. The gel mobility shift assay was performed with two concentrations of SaFapR (100 nM or 500 nM), previously incubated at different concentrations of malonyl-CoA for 15 min at room temperature followed by addition of the probe to the SaFapR-malonyl-CoA complex. (c) Effect of malonyl-CoA analogs on SaFapR binding to PfapR. SaFapR (200 nM) was previously incubated, as described in b, with malonyl-CoA (lanes 3 and 4), acetyl-CoA (lanes 5 and 6), propionyl-CoA (lanes 7 and 8) or succinyl-CoA (lanes 9 and 10) before adding the PfapR probe to the reaction mixture. Gels were stained with SYBR GREEN and scanned at 530 nm.



Figure S3.

Conservation of FapR function in S. aureus. (A) RT-PCR results showing the expression of two genes from the fap regulon (plsX, fabH) in two different strains (RN4220, HG001). Relative levels of transcripts were measured by qRT-PCR. Expression levels were normalized using 16S RNA as an internal standard and are indicated as an n-fold change, expressed as the means and standard deviations of quadruplicate experiments. (B) SaFapR complements a B. subtilis fapR null strain. Cultures of strains GS413 (squares; ΔfapR, PfabHB-lacZ, amyE::spc), GS373 (circles; ΔfapR, PfabHB-lacZ, amyE::Pxyl-BsfapR:spc) and GS416 (triangles; ΔfapR, PfabHB-lacZ, amyE::Pxyl-SafapR:spc) were incubated in LB medium in the presence of xylose 0.1% (w/v) at 37°C and growth was monitored. Samples were removed to assay ß-galactosidase-specific activity at the indicated times. A single experiment representative of three repeats is shown. Solid lines, ß-galactosidase-specific activity; dotted lines, OD525.



Figure S4.

Alignment of the promoter regions of the genes and operons regulated by FapR. The -10 motifs of RNA polymerase binding boxes are indicated with rectangles. The conserved inverted repeat sequence is shaded and a consensus sequence is indicated at the bottom line. Bases are numbered related to the first base of the translation initiation codon.



Figure S5.

Different roles of the amphipatic linker helix αL in stabilizing the SaFapR-DNA and SaFapR-malonyl-CoA complexes. (A) Close view of the SaFapR-DNA complex. (B) Close view of the interactions between the EBD, the linker helix (green) and the DBD in the structure of the SaFapR-malonyl-CoA complex. In both cases, hydrophobic and hydrophilic side chains involved in inter-domain interactions are labeled. Malonyl-CoA binding triggers significant conformational changes in three main regions of the repressor: the connecting loop αL - β1, the amphipathic helix αL and the DBD. The side-chain of Arg110 from the EBD makes a key hydrogen bond with the main-chain carbonyl group of Glu77′ in the loop. In addition, the Glu77′ side-chain is hydrogen bonded to the main chain of His104 from the EBD, facilitating the formation of a strong salt bridge between the side-chains of Lys105 and Glu74′. The Ser102 side-chain makes a strong hydrogen bond with Val123, whereas its main chain interacts through hydrogen bonding networks with Ser72, Pro129 and a water molecule. Furthermore, the main-chain of Gln69 makes an electrostatic interaction with the side-chain of Lys127. These newly formed electrostatic/hydrogen-bond interactions allow the connecting loop αL - β1 to firmly interact with the core of the EBD. As a consequence, the amphipathic helix αL forms now an extended hydrophobic interface (Leu55, Ile59 and Val62), with both β1 (Ile83) and β2 (Ile94) strands of the EBD, and the α1–α2 connecting loop of the DBD (Pro25, Phe26 and Thr28). This structural arrangement is further stabilized by key electrostatic interactions. Arg56 makes a salt bridge with Asp96 located at the top of β2 and the side-chain of Asn66 makes a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of the main-chain of Leu82 on the β1 strand. Moreover, the side-chain of Tyr67 is oriented towards a hydrophobic pocket including residues Leu82, Val85 from β1, and Ile70, Ile73 and Phe78 from the connecting loop αL - β1.



Figure S6.

Sequence alignment of FapR. Amino acid sequence and secondary structure elements (green for DBD, pink for EBD) of SaFapR. Residues that interact with the pantetheine group of malonyl-CoA and with DNA are underlined by open and closed circles, respectively. Wavy lines indicate disordered regions in the crystal structure. Colored amino acid positions indicate highly conserved residues in non-redundant FapR sequences from 67 different bacterial species (yellow, >80%; orange, >95%).



Figure S7.

Structural superposition of the BsFapRΔ43-malonyl-CoA and SaFapR-malonyl-CoA complexes. Although the orientation of helix αL is different (it is involved in crystal packing contacts in BsFapRΔ43), binding of malonyl-CoA promotes the same conformation of the loop connecting this helix with the first β-strand of the EBD.



Table S1.

The fap regulon in B. subtilis and S. aureus.



Table S2.

Local base-pair step parameters of the DNA in complex with SaFapR.



Table S3.

Oligonucleotides used in this work.



Text S1.

Supplemental information, including additional experimental procedures.




We thank A. Haouz (Institut Pasteur) for performing robot-driven crystallization trials. We also thank ESRF, SOLEIL and SLS for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities and their staffs for assistance in using the beamlines. D.A. was a Marie Curie Incoming International Fellow (European Union), and D.d.M. was an International Research Scholar from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DA FS AB DdM PMA. Performed the experiments: DA GR MEG FS MD GES. Analyzed the data: DA GR MEG FS MD AB DdM PMA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MD GES DdM PMA. Wrote the paper: DA MEG FS DdM PMA.


  1. 1. Campbell JW, Cronan JE Jr (2011) Bacterial fatty acid biosynthesis: targets for antibacterial drug discovery. Annu Rev Microbiol 55: 305–332.
  2. 2. Zhang YM, Rock CO (2008) Membrane lipid homeostasis in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 222–233.
  3. 3. Overath P, Pauli G, Schairer HU (1969) Fatty acid degradation in Escherichia coli. An inducible acyl-CoA synthetase, the mapping of old-mutations, and the isolation of regulatory mutants. Eur J Biochem 7: 559–574.
  4. 4. DiRusso CC, Nunn WD (1985) Cloning and characterization of a gene (fadR) involved in regulation of fatty acid metabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 161: 583–588.
  5. 5. Henry MF, Cronan JE Jr (1991) Escherichia coli transcription factor that both activates fatty acid synthesis and represses fatty acid degradation. J Mol Biol 222: 843–849.
  6. 6. Henry MF, Cronan JE Jr (1992) A new mechanism of transcriptional regulation: release of an activator triggered by small molecule binding. Cell 70: 671–67.
  7. 7. Lu YJ, Zhang YM, Rock CO (2004) Product diversity and regulation of type II fatty acid synthases. Biochem Cell Biol 82: 145–155.
  8. 8. Cronan JE Jr, Subrahmanyam S (1998) FadR, transcriptional co-ordination of metabolic expediency. Mol Microbiol 29: 937–943.
  9. 9. DiRusso CC, Heimert TL, Metzger AK (1992) Characterization of FadR, a global transcriptional regulator of fatty acid metabolism in Escherichia coli. Interaction with the fadB promoter is prevented by long chain fatty acyl coenzyme A. J Biol Chem 267: 8685–8691.
  10. 10. DiRusso CC, Tsvetnitsky V, Hojrup P, Knudsen J (1998) Fatty acyl-CoA binding domain of the transcription factor FadR. Characterization by deletion, affinity labeling, and isothermal titration calorimetry. J Biol Chem 273: 33652–33659.
  11. 11. Raman N, DiRusso CC (1995) Analysis of acyl coenzyme A binding to the transcription factor FadR and identification of amino acid residues in the carboxyl terminus required for ligand binding. J Biol Chem 270: 1092–1097.
  12. 12. van Aalten DM, DiRusso CC, Knudsen J (2001) The structural basis of acyl coenzyme A-dependent regulation of the transcription factor FadR. EMBO J 20: 2041–2050.
  13. 13. van Aalten DM, DiRusso CC, Knudsen J, Wierenga RK (2000) Crystal structure of FadR, a fatty acid-responsive transcription factor with a novel acyl coenzyme A-binding fold. EMBO J 19: 5167–5177.
  14. 14. Xu Y, Heath RJ, Li Z, Rock CO, White SW (2001) The FadR.DNA complex. Transcriptional control of fatty acid metabolism in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 276: 17373–17379.
  15. 15. Zhu K, Choi KH, Schweizer HP, Rock CO, Zhang YM (2006) Two aerobic pathways for the formation of unsaturated fatty acids in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 60: 260–273.
  16. 16. Zhang YM, Zhu K, Frank MW, Rock CO (2007) A Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcription factor that senses fatty acid structure. Mol Microbiol 66: 622–632.
  17. 17. Miller DJ, Zhang YM, Subramanian C, Rock CO, White SW (2010) Structural basis for the transcriptional regulation of membrane lipid homeostasis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 971–975.
  18. 18. Schujman GE, Paoletti L, Grossman AD, de Mendoza D (2003) FapR, a bacterial transcription factor involved in global regulation of membrane lipid biosynthesis. Dev Cell 4: 663–672.
  19. 19. Schujman GE, de Mendoza D (2008) Regulation of type II fatty acid synthase in Gram-positive bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 11: 148–152.
  20. 20. Schujman GE, Guerin M, Buschiazzo A, Schaeffer F, Llarrull Ll, et al. (2006) Structural basis of lipid biosynthesis regulation in Gram-positive bacteria. EMBO J 25: 4074–4083.
  21. 21. Leesong M, Henderson BS, Gillig JR, Schwab JM, Smith JL (1996) Structure of a dehydratase-isomerase from the bacterial pathway for biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids: two catalytic activities in one active site. Structure 4: 253–264.
  22. 22. Li J, Derewenda U, Dauter Z, Smith S, Derewenda ZS (2000) Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli thioesterase II, a homolog of the human Nef binding enzyme. Nat Struct Biol 7: 555–559.
  23. 23. Dillon SC, Bateman A (2004) The Hotdog fold: wrapping up a superfamily of thioesterases and dehydratases. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 109.
  24. 24. Pidugu LS, Maity K, Ramaswamy K, Surolia N, Suguna K (2009) Analysis of proteins with the ‘hot dog’ fold: prediction of function and identification of catalytic residues of hypothetical proteins. BMC Struct Biol 9: 37.
  25. 25. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339: 520–532.
  26. 26. David MZ, Daum RS (2010) Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev 23: 616–687.
  27. 27. Deleo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF (2010) Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 375: 1557–1568.
  28. 28. Martinez MA, et al. (2010) A novel role of malonyl-ACP in lipid homeostasis. Biochemistry 49: 3161–3167.
  29. 29. Orth P, Schnappinger D, Hillen W, Saenger W, Hinrichs W (2000) Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nat Struct Biol 7: 215–219.
  30. 30. Lewis M, et al. (1996) Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer. Science 271: 1247–1254.
  31. 31. Brinster S, et al. (2009) Type II fatty acid synthesis is not a suitable antibiotic target for Gram-positive pathogens. Nature 458: 83–86.
  32. 32. Parsons JB, Frank MW, Subramanian C, Saenkham P, Rock CO (2011) Metabolic basis for the differential susceptibility of Gram-positive pathogens to fatty acid synthesis inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 15378–15383.
  33. 33. Volkman BF, Lipson D, Wemmer DE, Kern D (2001) Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 291: 2429–2433.
  34. 34. Gambin Y, et al. (2009) Direct single-molecule observation of a protein living in two opposed native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 10153–10158.
  35. 35. Parsons JB, Rock CO (2011) Is bacterial fatty acid synthesis a valid target for antibacterial drug discovery? Curr Opin Microbiol 14: 544–549.
  36. 36. Brinster S, et al. (2010) Essentiality of FASII pathway for Staphylococcus aureus. Nature 463: E4–E5.
  37. 37. Paoletti L, Lu YJ, Schujman GE, de Mendoza D, Rock CO (2007) Coupling of fatty acid and phospholipid synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 189: 5816–5824.
  38. 38. Lu YJ, Zhang YM, Grimes KD, Qi J, Lee RE, Rock CO (2006) Acyl-phosphates initiate membrane phospholipid synthesis in Gram-positive pathogens. Mol Cell 23: 765–72.
  39. 39. Altenbern RA (1977) Cerulenin-inhibited cells of Staphylococcus aureus resume growth when supplemented with either a saturated or an unsaturated fatty acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 11: 574–576.
  40. 40. Zhang YM, Rock CO (2009) Transcriptional regulation in bacterial membrane lipid synthesis. J Lipid Res 50 Suppl: S115–119.
  41. 41. Raghow R, Yellaturu C, Deng X, Park EA, Elam MB (2008) SREBPs: the crossroads of physiological and pathological lipid homeostasis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 19: 65–73.
  42. 42. Herbert S, et al. (2010) Repair of global regulators in Staphylococcus aureus 8325 and comparative analysis with other clinical isolates. Infect Immun 78: 2877–2889.
  43. 43. Schneewind O, Model P, Fischetti VA (1992) Sorting of protein A to the staphylococcal cell wall. Cell 70: 267–281.
  44. 44. Kabsch W (2010) Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 125–132.
  45. 45. Leslie AGW (2009) iMosflm, version 1.0.4. MRC-LMB, Cambridge, UK.
  46. 46. Collaborative Computational Project (1994) The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 50: 760–763.
  47. 47. Trapani S, Navaza J (2008) AMoRe: classical and modern. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 64: 11–16.
  48. 48. Sheldrick GM (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr A 64: 112–122.
  49. 49. Bricogne G, Vonrhein C, Flensburg C, Schiltz M, Paciorek W (2003) Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 59: 2023–2030.
  50. 50. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53: 240–255.
  51. 51. Bricogne G, Blanc E, Brandl M, Flensburg C, Keller P, et al.. (2009). BUSTER. Version 2.9.3. Cambridge, UK: Global Phasing Ltd.
  52. 52. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 486–501.
  53. 53. Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, et al. (2007) MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W375–W383.
  54. 54. DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Palo Alto, CA USA: DeLano Scientific.
  55. 55. Lu XJ, Olson WK (2003) 3DNA: a software package for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic acid structures. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 5108–5121.