Advertisement
Research Article

Central Role of the Holliday Junction Helicase RuvAB in vlsE Recombination and Infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi

  • Tao Lin equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Tao Lin, Lihui Gao

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Lihui Gao equal contributor,

    equal contributor Contributed equally to this work with: Tao Lin, Lihui Gao

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Diane G. Edmondson,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Mary B. Jacobs,

    Affiliation: Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, United States of America

    X
  • Mario T. Philipp,

    Affiliation: Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, United States of America

    X
  • Steven J. Norris mail

    Steven.J.Norris@uth.tmc.edu

    Affiliations: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    X
  • Published: December 04, 2009
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679

Abstract

Antigenic variation plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of many infectious bacteria and protozoa including Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease. VlsE, a 35 kDa surface-exposed lipoprotein, undergoes antigenic variation during B. burgdorferi infection of mammalian hosts, and is believed to be a critical mechanism by which the spirochetes evade immune clearance. Random, segmental recombination between the expressed vlsE gene and adjacent vls silent cassettes generates a large number of different VlsE variants within the infected host. Although the occurrence and importance of vlsE sequence variation is well established, little is known about the biological mechanism of vlsE recombination. To identify factors important in antigenic variation and vlsE recombination, we screened transposon mutants of genes known to be involved in DNA recombination and repair for their effects on infectivity and vlsE recombination. Several mutants, including those in BB0023 (ruvA), BB0022 (ruvB), BB0797 (mutS), and BB0098 (mutS-II), showed reduced infectivity in immunocompetent C3H/HeN mice. Mutants in ruvA and ruvB exhibited greatly reduced rates of vlsE recombination in C3H/HeN mice, as determined by restriction fragment polymorphism (RFLP) screening and DNA sequence analysis. In severe combined immunodeficiency (C3H/scid) mice, the ruvA mutant retained full infectivity; however, all recovered clones retained the ‘parental’ vlsE sequence, consistent with low rates of vlsE recombination. These results suggest that the reduced infectivity of ruvA and ruvB mutants is the result of ineffective vlsE recombination and underscores the important role that vlsE recombination plays in immune evasion. Based on functional studies in other organisms, the RuvAB complex of B. burgdorferi may promote branch migration of Holliday junctions during vlsE recombination. Our findings are consistent with those in the accompanying article by Dresser et al., and together these studies provide the first examples of trans-acting factors involved in vlsE recombination.

Author Summary

Lyme disease is the most prevalent tick-borne infection in North America and Eurasia. It is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi and is transmitted to humans via the bite of infected ticks. These spirochetes can cause both acute and chronic infection and inflammation of the skin, joints, heart, and central nervous system. The persistence of infection despite the presence of an active immune response is dependent upon antigenic variation of VlsE, a 35 kDa surface-exposed lipoprotein. A large number of different VlsE variants are present in the host simultaneously and are generated by recombination of the vlsE gene with adjacent vls silent cassettes. To try to identify factors important in vlsE recombination and immune evasion, we selected mutants in genes involved in DNA recombination and repair and screened them for infectivity and vlsE recombination. Mutants in genes encoding RuvA and RuvB (which act together to promote the exchange of strands between two different DNA molecules) had reduced infectivity and greatly diminished vlsE recombination. In immunodeficient mice, ruvA mutants retained full infectivity, and no vlsE recombination was detected. Our findings reinforce the importance of vlsE variation in immune evasion and persistent infection.

Introduction

Lyme borreliosis is a multi-stage, systemic disease caused by members of the spirochete genus Borrelia, including Borrelia burgdorferi in North America and Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, and B. burgdorferi in Eurasia [1]. Spirochetes are transmitted to mammalian and avian hosts via the bite of hard-bodied ticks of Ixodes genus [2] and disseminate widely throughout the body in the first weeks of infection. If untreated in early stages, chronic and debilitating disease can develop in the skin, joints, heart, and central nervous system [1]. Infected individuals develop an active immune response to the pathogen yet are unable to clear the infection.

A common mechanism of immune evasion is antigenic variation, a process by which pathogens alter surface exposed antigenic proteins [3],[4]. The resulting variant organisms are immunologically distinct from parental strains and thereby gain a selective advantage over individuals that retain parental antigenic determinants. Bacteria that undergo antigenic variation often cause long term or repeated infections. Examples of such bacteria include Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, Borrelia hermsii, Treponema pallidum, Campylobacter jejuni, Mycoplasma synoviae, Mycoplasma pulmonis, and Anaplasma marginale.

Lyme disease Borrelia possess the vls (Variable Major Protein (VMP)-like sequence) system, a robust antigenic variation mechanism involving DNA recombination at the locus that expresses the surface exposed lipoprotein VlsE [5],[6],[7],[8],[9]. The vls locus consists of the vlsE expression site and a contiguous array of 15 vls silent cassettes, which have homology to the central region of the expression site. Gene conversion events involving replacement of regions of the vlsE expression site cassette with segments of the silent cassettes occur continuously during mouse infection, resulting in a myriad of vlsE sequence variants in each infected animal [10],[11]. Within each cassette, there are six variable regions (VRs) that display considerable sequence diversity, interspersed with six relatively invariant regions (IRs). The structure of the VlsE polypeptide is predominated by alpha helices that are believed to be important in maintaining protein structure [12]. The variable regions form random coils on the membrane distal surface of the protein, the region most likely to be exposed to the host immune system. VlsE variants have different epitopes when compared with parental VlsE1 polypeptide [10],[13], indicating that sequence changes in vlsE result in true antigenic variation.

In the B. burgdorferi strain B31, the vls locus is located near the telomere of the linear plasmid lp28-1 [10]. Loss of lp28-1 in B. burgdorferi B31 is associated with an intermediate infectivity phenotype in immunocompetent mice, in which infection lasts for less than 3 weeks and is largely restricted to joint tissue [14],[15],[16],[17]. Spirochetes lacking lp28-1 are able to survive and cause disease at all tissue sites in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice [17],[18], indicating that one or more gene products encoded on lp28-1 play an important protective role against adaptive immunity. Bankhead and Chaconas [19] recently demonstrated that the vls locus is the important mediator of infectivity in lp28-1. Deletion of the locus by telomere-mediated truncation resulted in an intermediate infectivity phenotype similar to that displayed by B. burgdorferi lacking lp28-1, while deletion of the other end of the plasmid had no detectable effect on infectivity.

The mechanisms that regulate vlsE recombination and expression are not well understood. vlsE recombination events have not been detected in ticks, during in vitro culture, or in dialysis membrane chambers embedded in rats, suggesting that non-dialyzable host components play a role in initiation of recombination [20],[21],[22],[23]. In contrast, vlsE recombination is detectable within 4 days of mouse inoculation, and appears to occur throughout the course of mammalian infection [22],[24]. Approximately 50% of recovered spirochetes have recombined vlsE sequences during the first 7 days of mouse infection; by four weeks, no organisms with parental vlsE sequence can be recovered [11],[22]. In immunodeficient SCID mice, spirochetes with the parental vlsE disappear more gradually, indicating that the adaptive immune response is required for the rapid elimination of organisms expressing the parental VlsE [11]. Although analyses of vlsE transcription levels during mammalian infection have yielded variable results, immunoblot analysis indicates that VlsE protein expression is dramatically upregulated during mouse or rabbit infection [25],[26].

Genes involved in DNA recombination and repair have been found to play a role in antigenic variation in other bacteria. For example, in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, pilin antigenic variation requires several trans-acting factors in the RecF-like recombination pathway, including RecA, RecX, RecJ, RecO, RecQ, and RecR [27],[28],[29] as well as RecG and a functional RuvABC complex [30]. However, in B. burgdorferi no genes have been yet identified that play a role in recombination within vlsE, although recA has been shown to be dispensable [31].

To identify proteins that play a role in vlsE recombination, we screened transposon mutants of DNA recombination and repair genes for infectivity and vlsE recombination. We found that mutants in the genes encoding the Holliday junction helicase polypeptides RuvA and RuvB were compromised in their ability to undergo vlsE recombination and displayed a reduced infectivity phenotype. In SCID mice, ruvA mutants retained full infectivity. vlsE sequences recovered from SCID mice were identical to parental vlsE sequence, suggesting that the failure to undergo vlsE recombination was a critical factor in the reduced infectivity phenotype. Furthermore, ruvA mutants had no increase in sensitivity to DNA damage. Nearly identical results were obtained in the accompanying article by Dresser et al. [32].

Results

Screening of putative DNA recombination and repair mutants for infectivity and VlsE variation

For this study, 9 transposon insertion mutants representing 7 different genes whose homologues are known to be involved in DNA recombination and repair in other bacteria were selected from a large Signature Tagged Mutagenesis (STM) panel to screen for their effect on infectivity and vlsE recombination (Table 1). Independent mutants from two of the genes were included to test the possible role of different insertion sites on infectivity and vlsE recombination. T05P01C02 and T10P01D06 are independent mutants of BB0797 with insertion ratios of 0.73 and 0.97 respectively. (The insertion ratio represents the relative position of the transposon insertion in a coding sequence, with the entire coding sequence having a value of 1.0). Likewise, T08P01E02 and T11P01F09 are independent mutants from gene BBE29 with insertion ratios of 0.33 and 0.30. Each mutant was injected in 5 mice and skin biopsies were taken at days 7 and 14 after inoculation and cultured for B. burgdorferi. Mice were sacrificed on day 28 of infection, and samples taken from skin, tibiotarsal joint, heart, and bladder were cultured to recover infectious organisms. B. burgdorferi maintained in in vitro culture sometimes lose plasmids that are not required for in vitro growth but may be required for infectivity. Therefore, the plasmid content of each mutant was determined and compared with that of the parental clone 5A18NP1. Circular plasmid cp9 was found to be missing in two mutants (T11P01A01 and T11P01F09) and lp21 is lacking in T10P01D09. However, previous studies have shown that neither cp9 nor lp21 are essential for infection of mice [14],[15].

thumbnail

Table 1. Transposon mutants utilized in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.t001

As in previous studies, the parental strain 5A18NP1 was recovered from 29 of 30 tissue samples on days 7, 14, and 28 post inoculation [33]. Three of the nine DNA repair mutants tested (T11P01A01, T03TC051, and T05P01C02) exhibited reduced infectivity and one (MG065) lost infectivity in immunocompetent mice (Table 2). One of the mutS mutants (T05P01C02) displayed a reduced infectivity phenotype, whereas the other mutant (T10P01D06) had normal infectivity. The insertion site for the highly infectious mutant was very close to the end of the coding sequence (0.97), so this mutant may express a functional product. ruvA (T11P01A01) and ruvB (T03TC051) mutants both exhibited intermediate infectivity patterns. While 5/5 skin cultures were positive for both mutants at day 7 post inoculation, by 2 weeks no skin cultures were spirochete positive, and at 4 weeks only 6 of 20 and 10 of 16 tissue sites were culture positive for the ruvA and ruvB mutants, respectively. We also examined the growth rates of the ruvA and ruvB mutants in vitro. Both mutants had growth kinetics very similar to that of the parental strain 5A18NP1 (data not shown), indicating that the reduced infectivity phenotype observed for the mutants was not due to a growth defect.

thumbnail

Table 2. Infectivity of B. burgdorferi DNA repair and recombination mutants in CH3/HeN mice at days 7, 14 and 28 post inoculation.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.t002

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was used to estimate the extent of vlsE variation in recovered organisms. Amplicons corresponding to the vlsE cassette region were generated by PCR from uncloned cultures and digested with HphI. This restriction enzyme recognizes a 4-bp sequence that occurs with varying frequency as a result of vlsE recombination. The vlsE cassette region of 5A18NP1, the parental strain used in this study, has a single HphI site near one end (Figure 1A). As expected, cultures from mice inoculated with 5A18NP1 displayed significant RFLP variability that increased over the course of infection, as indicated by multiple bands or the presence of a smear in the HphI-digested samples (Figure 1A). In contrast, the ruvA and ruvB mutant cultures (Figure 1B and 1C) had vlsE RFLP patterns that were either unchanged or had relatively few bands without smearing, indicating that few vlsE variants had been generated during the course of infection. The other putative DNA recombination and repair mutants had complex vlsE RFLP patterns, indicating that a variety of vlsE variants had been generated during infection and that vlsE recombination likely had occurred normally (data not shown).

thumbnail

Figure 1. RFLP analysis of vlsE cassette region PCR products indicates reduced vlsE variation in ruvA and ruvB mutants of B. burgdorferi.

Representative results obtained following inoculation of C3H/HeN mice with (A) the parental clone 5A18NP1, (B) the transposon mutant T11P01A01 (ruvA::himar1) and (C) T03TC051 (ruvB::himar1) are shown. Cultures from the indicated time points and tissues were used as the source of template DNA for amplification of the vlsE cassette region. The resulting PCR products were either treated (+) or not treated (-) with the restriction enzyme HphI. Presence of multiple bands or a smear in the HphI-treated sample is indicative of the presence of a high number of vlsE variants. The day post inoculation is indicated by D4 through D28. Tissues examined include skin (S), bladder (B), heart (H) and tibiotarsal joint (J).

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.g001

Characterization of the ruvA mutant

ruvA and ruvB have been reported to be part of a larger operon containing two additional genes (Figure S1A), queA (BB0021, S-adenosylmethionine:tRNA ribosyltransferase-isomerase) and pfpB (BB0020, diphosphate-fructose-6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase) [34]. To determine whether expression of other genes in the operon might be disturbed by the transposon insertion, we performed RT-PCR on RNA samples from the parental strain 5A18NP1 and the ruvA mutant T11P01A01. Primer pair 1 generates a PCR fragment from within the ruvA coding region that crosses the transposon insertion site. As expected, this fragment can be generated using RNA from the parental strain, but not using RNA from the ruvA mutant, or RNA untreated with reverse transcriptase (Figure S1B). However, RT-PCR products spanning regions of both ruvB and queA were generated from both strains using primer pair 3 and 4 (Figure S1B). In the ruvA mutant T11P01A01, the transposon is inserted such that a ‘read-through’ transcript could possibly be generated from the flgBP::aacC1 cassette within the transposable element. To test that possibility we used primer pair 2, which generates a PCR fragment corresponding to the ruvA coding sequence downstream of the transposon insertion site. A product could be generated from both strains (Figure S1B), suggesting that ‘read-through’ may be occurring from either the transposon or the native promoter. Thus, we conclude that T11P01A01 is defective in expression of ruvA, but that transcription of ruvB, queA and pfpB is occurring. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of polar effects resulting from changes in the levels of expression of ruvB, queA and pfpB.

Inactivation of ruvA results in reduced infectivity in immunocompetent (C3H/HeN) mice but full infectivity in immunodeficient (SCID) mice

To further examine the effects of ruvA disruption on infectivity and vlsE recombination, a more detailed analysis of infectivity was performed (Table 3). Groups of ten immunocompetent C3H/HeN mice and ten C3H/scid mice were each inoculated with 105 organisms of either the T11P01A01 (the ruvA mutant), or the parental clone 5A18NP1. Mice were also inoculated with the previously characterized lp28-1 clone 5A8 [15] as a negative control. Groups of 5 mice were sacrificed at days 14 and 28 post inoculation. Samples of ear, tibiotarsal joint, heart, and bladder were collected for recovery of spirochetes. As expected, the positive control clone 5A18NP1 was fully infectious in both mice strains; spirochetes were isolated from all sites at day 14 and day 28 post inoculation (Table 3). The lp28-1 clone 5A8 exhibited the expected intermediate infectivity phenotype. In normal mice inoculated with 5A8, spirochetes were recovered from only three joint cultures at day 14, and no organisms could be recovered by day 28 post inoculation. However, all tissue sites were infected in C3H/scid mice inoculated with 5A8. The ruvA mutant exhibited an infectivity phenotype similar to that of lp28-1 B. burgdorferi at day 14, but resulted in some positive cultures at day 28 post inoculation (Table 3). In C3H/HeN mice infected with the ruvA mutant, only 3 joint cultures of 20 possible cultures were positive for spirochetes at day 14 post inoculation, whereas 20 of 20 cultures were positive in the C3H/scid mouse group. At day 28, the ruvA mutant was recovered from 2/5 ear, 2/5 tibiotarsal joint, 2/5 heart, and 1/5 bladder cultures in immunocompetent mice, while again all cultures were positive in the C3H/scid mouse group. These results indicate that the ruvA mutant is significantly impaired in infectivity compared to the parental strain; it is not, however, as severely compromised as the strain lacking lp28-1.

thumbnail

Table 3. Infectivity phenotype of the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 in immunocompetent C3H/HeN and immunodeficient C3H/scid mice is similar to that of the lp28-1 clone 5A8.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.t003

RuvAB is not required for survival in ticks

We also tested the ability of B. burgdorferi carrying the ruvA or ruvB mutation to survive in ticks. I. scapularis nymphs were inoculated with the ruvA mutant T11P01A01, the ruvB mutant T03TC051, or the parental strain 5A18NP1 by capillary feeding. Ticks were held for 21–25 days and cultured for B. burgdorferi either before or immediately after feeding on 3 C3H/HeN mice. B. burgdorferi were readily detected in both fed and unfed ticks, as determined by direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining and culture (Table 4). This result indicates that the ruvA and ruvB mutations do not abrogate the ability of B. burgdorferi to survive in ticks. In addition, the mutant spirochetes were able to multiply upon tick feeding (Table 4). Fewer spirochetes were recovered from fed ticks carrying the ruvB mutant as compared to the ruvA mutant or the parental strain, but enough spirochetes were present in fed ticks to expect a mouse infection to result. However, tissues collected 4 weeks post tick inoculation with the ruvA or ruvB mutants were consistently culture negative (Table 4). The failure to recover organisms from any cultures derived from tick-inoculated mice (as compared to the sporadically positive cultures from needle-inoculated animals; Table 2) may be due to the lower number of organisms delivered during tick inoculation as compared to needle inoculation, coupled with the decreased survival of ruvA or ruvB mutants in immunocompetent mice at 28 days post inoculation (Table 2).

thumbnail

Table 4. B. burgdorferi ruvA and ruvB mutants survive well in ticks, but do not establish long-term infection in mice following tick-mediated inoculation.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.t004

Inactivation of ruvA or ruvB results in reduced vlsE recombination

Spirochetes recovered from infected mice were isolated by colony formation, and the vlsE cassette region sequences of the resulting clones were determined by PCR amplification and sequencing to examine the effect of ruvA or ruvB mutation on vlsE recombination. For the ruvA mutant T11P01A01, a total of 382 vlsE sequences were analyzed, comprising sequences from both immunocompetent and SCID mice, at three time points and from four tissues. For the ruvB mutant T03TC051, a total of 62 clones isolated from C3H/HeN mice were sequenced, including 22 obtained from skin cultures 7 days post inoculation, and 40 clones from joint, heart, bladder and skin cultures 28 days after inoculation.

The overall pattern of vlsE recombination observed is depicted in Figure 2. For each mouse group and time point, it was determined whether the recovered clones retained the parental vlsE sequence, had a unique vlsE sequence, or shared the same vlsE variant sequence when compared to other clones from the same animal (‘vlsE sequences with siblings’). It has been determined previously that vlsE variation is not detectable during in vitro culture [22]; therefore all inoculated organisms initially contained the parental vlsE sequence.

thumbnail

Figure 2. vlsE sequence variation observed with the parental strain 5A18NP1 and the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 and the ruvB mutant T03TC051 following inoculation of immunocompetent C3H/HeN mice and immunodeficient C3H/scid mice.

The combined results from all tissues examined for each time point are shown. The vlsE cassette regions of individual B. burgdorferi clones were amplified by PCR, sequenced, and characterized as either identical to the parental vlsE sequence, a unique vlsE sequence for that mouse, or two or more clones with an identical vlsE variant sequence from a mouse (vlsE sequences with siblings).

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.g002

As observed in prior studies with B. burgdorferi B31 clones, the parental strain 5A18NP1 underwent rapid vlsE recombination in both C3H/HeN and C3H/scid mouse hosts. By 14 days post inoculation, 0/59 clones from C3H/HeN mice had retained the parental sequence. Clones with unique vlsE cassette region sequences predominated after 7 days, although a surprisingly high proportion of sibling variants was observed in C3H/HeN mice inoculated with 5A18NP1 (Figure 2, Table S1). At 14 and 28 days post inoculation, no clones with the parental vlsE sequence were detected. A similar pattern was observed during infection of C3H/scid mice, although the dilution of parental sequence clones occurred at a slower rate; 19/76 clones (25%) still had the parental sequence on day 14. However, even in C3H/scid mice no clones with the parental vlsE sequence were recovered at day 28 post inoculation.

In contrast, sequence analysis demonstrated that very little vlsE sequence variation occurred during infection of mice with the ruvA mutant T11P01A11 (Figure 2, Table S1). In immunocompetent mice, only clones with the parental sequence were recovered up to 14 days post inoculation. By day 28 very few (3 of 114, 3%) of the clones retained the parental sequence; however, the remaining clones were quite restricted in terms of sequence variation, with each animal possessing only 1 or 2 variant types. Surprisingly, only parental sequence clones were recovered from C3H/scid mice on days 14 and 28 post inoculation, indicating that clones that had not undergone vlsE variation predominated in the absence of immune selection. The ruvB mutant T03TC051 also exhibited reduced vlsE sequence variation during infection of C3H/HeN mice (Figure 2, Table S1).

The differences between sequence variation in 5A18NP1 and T11P01A01 are further illustrated in Figure 3. Sequence diversity among the clones isolated at day 28 post inoculation from C3H/HeN mice was analyzed using phylogenetic tree software. The 63 clones from infection with 5A18NP1 were from joint, heart, bladder, and ear tissues of a single mouse, whereas the 114 clones for T11P01A01 were from the 12 culture-positive samples from 6 different mice. With clone 5A18NP1, 31/63 (49%) of the clones characterized possessed unique vlsE sequences; the remaining clones were variant siblings that were isolated from the same mouse tissue. Moreover, closely related sequences were often isolated from the same tissue (Figure 3A, brackets), indicating that vlsE sequences in sibling clones were diverging within those tissues. For the ruvA mutant T11P01A11, only eight different vlsE sequences could be detected among the 114 clones examined in the 6 mice, and no more than two different sequences were found in any one animal (Figure 3B). Moreover, clones with the same sequence were often found in more than one tissue site (Figure 3B, brackets). Three clones that retained the parental vlsE sequence were also isolated. These results provide further evidence that the ruvA mutant is severely compromised in its ability to undergo vlsE recombination.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Reduced vlsE sequence diversity generated following inoculation of C3H/HeN mice with the ruvA mutant T11P01A01.

Clones were isolated from C3H/HeN mice 28 days post inoculation with (A) the parental strain 5A18NP1 or (B) T11P01A01. The vlsE cassette region sequences of each clone were optimally aligned and then analyzed for sequence diversity using a phylogenetic tree program. The 5A18NP1 clones were isolated from a single mouse, whereas the T11P01A01 clones were obtained from all positive cultures of 6 inoculated mice. The groups of clones isolated from each mouse and their tissue source are indicated. In (A), brackets demarcate clusters of related (but often nonidentical) clones that occurred in the mouse infected with 5A18NP1. In the 5A18NP1 group, there were 31 unique vlsE sequences, 10 sequences with siblings, and 0 parental sequences. In (B), brackets indicate clones with identical vlsE sequences that were isolated from the 6 mice, frequently from multiple tissues. In this group of clones from mice inoculated with the ruvA mutant, there were 0 unique sequences, 8 sequences with many siblings, and 3 parental sequences. Trees are rooted with the 5A18NP1 parental vlsE sequence. A larger version of this figure is available at the website http://www.uth.tmc.edu/pathology/borreli​a/.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.g003

The sequences of 17 bp direct repeats at the 5′ and 3′ ends of vlsE central cassette were examined in all of the vlsE sequences recovered from ruvA mutants. No changes were identified indicating that vlsE recombination was not perturbed in the ruvA mutants due to instability of the direct repeats during mouse infection and/or vlsE recombination.

In E. coli and other organisms, ruvA and ruvB act in concert to promote DNA branch migration. Therefore, we also examined the effects of ruvB mutation on vlsE sequence variation in C3H/HeN mice. As shown in Figures 2 and S3 and in Table S1, the ruvB mutant T03TC051 exhibited reduced vlsE recombination rates similar to those observed for the ruvA mutant. No vlsE variants were observed at 7 days post inoculation. On day 28, the vlsE cassette region sequences of 12 to 14 clones from each of three mice were determined. Each animal was found to have only 1 to 3 vlsE variant sequences, and 5 clones with the parental vlsE sequence were isolated from Animal 3 (Figure S3). Only one clone with a unique vlsE variant sequence was identified (1/40, 2.5%). There were subsets of clones with the same vlsE variant sequence, consistent with the outgrowth of siblings of rare vlsE variants (Figures 2 and S3). Thus the ruvB mutant T03TC051 had an infectivity and vlsE variation phenotype that was quite similar to that observed for the ruvA mutant T11P01A01.

Analysis of vlsE recombination events in the ruvA and ruvB mutants

The non-parental vlsE variants recovered 28 days post infection with the ruvA and ruvB mutants were analyzed to determine the length, location and silent cassette source of the recombination events (Figure 4, Figure S2). Each sequence was aligned with parental vlsE sequence, codon formatted and analyzed using a semi-automated analysis program [11]. The program compares each codon to parental and silent vls sequences and depicts the result (identity or no identity) as colored bars with each silent cassette assigned a unique color. Dark regions represent the sequence changes that may have resulted by recombination with that silent cassette. The lighter colored regions are contiguous codons that match both parental and silent cassette sequences and thus represent the possible boundaries of a recombination event.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Low complexity of vlsE recombination events in ruvA and ruvB mutants.

The positions of the six variable regions (VR1–VR6) and six relatively invariant regions (IR1–IR6) within the vlsE central cassette region are provided at the top of the figure. The locations and silent cassette sources of the most likely recombination events for each clone depicted are indicated. A representative clone from a 28 day infection with the parental strain 5A18NP1 is shown at the top. The remainder of the figure shows the vlsE variant clonotypes isolated from C3H/HeN mice 28 days post inoculation with the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 or the ruvB mutant T03TC051. The possible involvement of each of the silent cassettes in sequence variation was analyzed using an Excel®/Visual Basic program, as described previously [11] and depicted in Fig. S2. The horizontal colored bars represent regions of each silent cassette (vls2 to vls16, top to bottom) that match the sequence changes found in the variant clone. Dark regions in each bar correspond to the actual sequence changes, whereas the lighter portion of the bar represents the maximum possible region of that silent cassette exchanged into vlsE to produce the observed sequence change. In isolates from Animal 2 inoculated with the ruvA mutant, a 9 bp untemplated change (black hatched box) that did not match the vls silent cassettes or any other genomic sequence was present in all clones isolated.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.g004

The most likely recombination events are presented in Figure 4; a more detailed presentation showing all silent cassettes potentially involved in the recombination events is shown in Figure S2. Variants recovered from infections with 5A18NP1 at day 28 of infection are usually difficult to assign to a single silent cassette with confidence and appear to have undergone multiple recombination events ([4] and data not shown). For example, the simplest explanation for the variant recovered from a mouse infected with 5A18NP1 (Figure 4, first panel) appears to involve multiple recombinations of varied lengths with 6 different silent cassettes. In contrast, the results obtained with the ruvA and ruvB mutants were consistent with the occurrence of relatively rare and elongated vlsE recombination events (Figure 4). This pattern is exemplified by the vlsE sequence recovered from animal 1, which likely represents a single recombination event with vls5 spanning almost the entire cassette region. Although many silent cassettes have sequence identity to the variant residues, vls5 represents the only continuous match over the entire region (Figure S2). One variant (animal 2) is predicted to have undergone untemplated changes (not matching any vlsE silent cassette) in VR-I followed by an intermittent recombination event with vls2. Several of the recombination events found in the ruvA mutant appear to be intermittent, i.e. the recombination events were discontinuous over the length of the cassette, alternating between the template cassette and vlsE1. This intermittent recombination has been previously observed in vlsE recombination [11]. In addition, we noted that all recombination events from ruvA mutants included variable regions IV through VI. This bias is not observed with the parental strain [4]. Equally striking is length of the recombination events observed in the ruvA mutant. Coutte et al. [11] analyzed 126 clones that had undergone a single recombination event and identified the minimum and maximum predicted lengths of recombination. The majority of these clones (55%) had minimum recombination lengths of 1–5 nucleotides and only 28% had minimum recombination lengths of >15 nucleotides. The variants obtained from ruvA mutant infections, however, had a median minimum recombination length of 168 bp (range 91 to 479 bp), and a median maximum recombination length of 269 bp (range 111 to 546 bp).

Another unusual feature of the recombination events seen in the ruvA mutant is the distribution of silent cassette usage. Only 3 silent cassettes, vls2, vls4, and vls5 were used in the seven templated variants. vls4 and vls5 were each used twice. vls2, the silent gene most proximal to the expression cassette has been observed to be used very rarely in infections with wild type B. burgdorferi, yet we observed it in three of seven templated ruvA variants. These results suggest that the normal mechanism of silent template selection may be perturbed in ruvA mutants.

The vlsE sequences derived from infection with the ruvB mutant displayed similar features to those from the ruvA mutant (Figures 4 and S2). Most sequences were the result of single recombination events and used few vls silent cassette templates. The recombinations observed were unusually long, with a median minimum recombination length of 151 bp (range 119 to 389 bp) and an average maximum length of 179 bp (range 151 to 561 bp). Recombination events always included most of the 3′ end of the recombination cassette; however, these recombinations did not always include VR6, as observed for the recombination events derived from ruvA mutants.

Antibody responses to vlsE in ruvA and ruvB mutants

To determine whether mice infected with the ruvA and ruvB mutants developed a robust antibody response to VlsE, we performed ELISAs on serum from infected animals. We found that serum from animals infected with the ruvA or ruvB mutants displayed more variable antibody responses to VlsE than animals infected with the parental B. burgdorferi strain (data not shown). Some animals displayed similar reactivity to sera from animals infected with parental strain while others displayed lower anti-VlsE activity. However, low anti-VlsE titers did not necessarily correlate with positive B. burgdorferi cultures from harvested organs. It is speculated that low quantities of anti-VlsE antibodies in some mice may correspond to early clearance of B. burgdorferi, thus resulting in a limited stimulation of the immune response against Borrelia antigens, including VlsE.

Attempted complementation of the ruvA mutant

In an attempt to fully demonstrate the role of ruvA in vlsE sequence variation and infectivity, we complemented the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 with the shuttle vector pKFSS1 [35] containing either ruvA alone, ruvAruvB, or ruvAruvBqueApfpB (the four genes in the predicted operon; Figure S1). A 264-bp region upstream of ruvA predicted to include the transcriptional promoter was included in all three constructs. The integrity of the resulting plasmids was confirmed by sequencing the inserts, and transformation of T11P01A01 was demonstrated by streptomycin selection followed by PCR using one primer specific for the pKFSS1 vector sequence and one primer corresponding to the B. burgdorferi DNA insert. Groups of three mice were each inoculated intradermally (105 organisms/mouse) with one of two clones containing each complementation construct, yielding 3×6 = 18 mice inoculated with complemented lones. The two control groups (3 mice each) were inoculated with positive control 5A18NP1 and the non-complemented ruvA mutant T11P01A01. All strains yielded positive cultures from each of 3 skin sites taken distant from the inoculation site on day 7, indicating that the infection was successful in each case. Six representative day 7 cultures were tested for the presence of the complementing plasmids by PCR, and yielded the expected amplicons. All cultures except those from 5A18NP1-inoculated mice were negative on day 14 post inoculation, and on day 28 the proportions of positive clones for the complemented clones were similar to that obtained for the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 (data not shown). In addition, 17 complemented clones isolated on day 7 post inoculation were examined for vlsE recombination, and none exhibited vlsE sequence changes; this result was similar to what had been observed previously with uncomplemented ruvA mutant clones at this time point (Figure 2, Table S1). Therefore attempts to restore infectivity and vlsE sequence variation to wild type levels by complementation have thus far been unsuccessful.

Inactivation of ruvA does not result in increased sensitivity to DNA damage

In many microorganisms, ruvA is important in the repair of DNA damage resulting from UV irradiation or chemical mutagens. To assess the role of B. burgdorferi ruvA in DNA repair we monitored the survival of the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 subjected to DNA damaging conditions. Log phase cultures were irradiated with increasing doses of UV (254nm) light, and cultured to determine spirochete survival by colony counting. Figure 5A shows the results of a representative experiment. The parental strain 5A18NP1, and ruvA mutants had a similar number of colonies surviving at all UV doses, indicating that ruvA mutants do not have increased sensitivity to UV irradiation.

thumbnail

Figure 5. The ruvA mutant T11P01A01 does not exhibit enhanced sensitivity to UV light or mitomycin C.

(A) Survival of ruvA mutant and parental strain 5A18NP1 after exposure of UV light. The dosages of UV irradiation (254 nm) applied to the bacterial suspensions are indicated. (B) Survival of ruvA mutant and parental strain 5A18NP1 after 14 h treatment with the indicated doses of mitomycin C in BSK II medium. Colony counts on duplicate or triplicate plates were utilized to determine the concentration of surviving B. burgdorferi. Results shown are for representative experiments from three independent studies for each treatment.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.g005

Mitomycin C causes DNA damage by crosslinking complementary DNA strands at CpG sequences and is a commonly used reagent to examine the cellular response to DNA damage. To determine the sensitivity of the ruvA mutants to mitomycin C we assessed the viability of the ruvA mutant T11P01A11 and the parental strain 5A18NP1 after 14 hours exposure to increasing doses of mitomycin C. Treated cultures were plated and the number of colonies visible after 2–3 weeks incubation was used to assess spirochete survival. Figure 5B shows the survival of B. burgdorferi colonies after exposure to varied concentrations of mitomycin C. We observed no differences in survival between the ruvA mutant and the parental strain 5A18NP1.

Discussion

We conducted a genetic screen for trans-acting factors involved in vlsE antigenic variation in B. burgdorferi. Of the seven genes examined in this screen, four exhibited diverse PCR-RFLP patterns of vlsE, indicating that the inactivated genes are not centrally involved in vlsE recombination in C3H/HeN mice. Mutant MG065 in BB0098 (annotated as a recombination and DNA strand exchange inhibitor and as mutS-II in other organisms) was not recovered from inoculated mice, and thus could not be evaluated for vlsE variation. Two of the remaining transposon mutants, which had disruptions in the B. burgdorferi orthologs of the Holliday junction helicase genes ruvA and ruvB, had reduced vlsE recombination. The only other mutant that exhibited reduced infectivity and PCR-RFLP diversity was a mutS mutant, T05P01C02. A second mutS mutant, T10P01D06, had an insertion site near the end of the gene (insertion ratio 0.97); this clone had normal infectivity and RFLP results, indicating that a functional product is likely produced. The possible role of mutS in vlsE recombination will be investigated further in a separate study.

The predicted proteins encoded by the B. burgdorferi BB0023 and BB0022 open reading frames have a high degree of homology with the Holliday junction helicase proteins RuvA and RuvB, respectively, of other organisms. In Escherichia coli, the 22-kDa protein RuvA specifically targets RuvB to the Holliday junctions [36],[37], and the combined action of RuvAB results in branch migration during homologous recombination [38]. The 19-kDa RuvC resolvase cleaves the Holliday junction and is required for resolution of Holliday junctions in E. coli [39]. No homolog of RuvC has been identified in Lyme disease Borrelia, although RuvC orthologs have been identified in other spirochetes including the relapsing fever organism B. turicatae, T. pallidum, T. denticola and L. interrogans. Aravind et al. has proposed that a family of predicted LE exonucleases may substitute for RuvC in B. burgdorferi [40]. In addition to their role in recombination, E.coli ruv mutants exhibit defects in DNA repair such as increased sensitivity to UV light and mitomycin C [41],[42].

The infectivity phenotypes of the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 and the ruvB mutant T03TC051 resemble those of B. burgdorferi strains that lack lp28-1 [14],[15],[17],[18] or the vls locus [19], although some differences exist. As shown in Tables 2 and 3, the ruvA and ruvB mutants exhibited lower culture positivity than the parental strain 5A18NP1 in immunocompetent C3H/HeN mice. The ruvA mutant culture positivity pattern was the same as the lp28-1 clone 5A8 on day 14 post inoculation in C3H/HeN mice, with only joint specimens yielding positive cultures (Table 3); however, 7/20 cultures in diverse tissues were positive for the ruvA mutant at day 28 post inoculation, as compared to a lack of positive cultures in the 5A8-inoculated animals. The ability of some ruvA organisms to survive is most likely due to the ability to express VlsE and to undergo limited vlsE recombination. The ruvA mutant and the lp28-1 clone 5A8 is able to infect all tissues in C3H/scid mice, as has been observed previously with lp28-1 strains and clones in which the vls locus was deleted from lp28-1 by telomere-mediated plasmid truncation [19]. Thus mutation of ruvA results in reduced ability to survive in the presence of the adaptive immune system, perhaps due to antibody responses against invariant or limited variation forms of VlsE.

We also tested the ability of B. burgdorferi carrying ruvA or ruvB mutations to survive in ticks. B. burgdorferi were readily recovered from both fed and unfed ticks suggesting that the ruvA and ruvB mutations do not abrogate the ability of B. burgdorferi to survive in ticks. However, the mutant spirochetes did not establish infection in C3H/HeN mice following tick inoculation (Table 4). These data suggest that the lack of detectable organisms at day 28 post mouse inoculation (Table 4) was due to the effects of ruvA and ruvB mutations on survival in mice rather than poor replication in ticks or transmission from ticks to mammals. The failure to recover organisms in cultures derived from mouse inoculation via ticks may be due to the relatively low number of organisms delivered during tick inoculation as compared to the 105 Borrelia per mouse used in the needle inoculation studies.

The reduced ability of the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 to undergo vlsE recombination is illustrated in Figures 3, 4, and S3. Figure 3 shows that vlsE variants were not detected on days 7 and 14 in C3H/HeN mice inoculated with the ruvA mutant; while vlsE variants are predominant on day 28, only one or two variant clones are detected in each mouse (Figures 4 and 5). Remarkably, no vlsE variants were detected at any time point following infection of C3H/scid mice with the ruvA mutant, whereas all of the clones examined at 28 days post inoculation were variants when C3H/scid mice were inoculated with the parental 5A18NP1 strain. Combining the reduced culture positivity results with the decreased vlsE variant diversity observed with the ruvA mutant, the following is evident: 1) inactivation of ruvA results in reduction of vlsE recombination rates, resulting in only a few variants in C3H/HeN mice and the lack of detected variants in C3H/scid mice; and 2) in C3H/HeN mice, the few clones that have undergone vlsE recombination are able to survive after the anti-VlsE response is activated, whereas nearly all of the parental clones are eliminated by day 28 post inoculation.

The types of recombination events observed in the ruvA mutant were also quite different than those observed in wild-type B. burgdorferi. The average length of observed recombination events was an order of magnitude larger than in wild type clones. Moreover, most of the predicted recombination events observed in the ruvA mutant also appeared to represent intermittent recombination events, with regions of recombination interrupted by stretches of the unchanged, parental vlsE sequence (Figure 5). Finally, vls2, vls4, and vls5 were the only silent cassettes utilized in the ruvA mutant. The ruvB mutant also exhibited a limited repertoire of silent cassette usage (cassettes 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8). Taken together, these results may indicate that the recombination process is different in the ruvA mutant than in wild-type organisms; i.e., the observed changes could involve a different, underlying recombination mechanism other than the as yet cryptic, vlsE-specific process that appears to be induced during mammalian infection.

We found that sensitivity of B. burgdorferi to UV radiation and mitomycin C exposure was not affected by ruvA mutation. In other bacteria such as E. coli, deficiencies in RuvA, RuvB, or RuvC result in increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, including UV irradiation and mitomycin C [43]. UV irradiation causes intra-strand thymine dimers in DNA, and the damage is repaired by RecA-mediated SOS response [44]. Mitomycin C exposure induces inter-strand cross-link in DNA, and an extended SOS response is needed to repair the damaged DNA [45]. Induction of genes encoding DNA repair enzymes during the SOS response is one of the most important DNA repair system in bacteria [46]. However, the B. burgdorferi genome does not encode a homolog of the SOS response repressor LexA, and SOS boxes (LexA binding sites in promoter regions) are not present upstream of recA and other genes that comprise the SOS regulon [47]. Also, expression of recA is not induced following UV exposure [48]. Thus B. burgdorferi appears to lack an SOS regulon. As an obligate parasite, B. burgdorferi is never exposed directly to UV light, and thus may have lost its ability to upregulate genes involved in the repair of DNA damage caused by radiation and other agents.

Thus far, our attempts to restore full infectivity and vlsE recombination through complementation with ruvA in the shuttle vector pKFSS1 have been unsuccessful. In addition, we have also tried using constructs containing ruvAruvB and ruvAruvBqueApfpB, in case the transposon insertion in ruvA has some polar effect on the expression of downstream genes. A 264-bp region upstream of ruvA was used in all of these constructs; it is presumed to contain the promoter, although the region lacks a strong consensus promoter sequence (e.g. −35 and −10 sequences with the proper spacing). BB0024, the gene upstream of ruvA, is oriented in the opposite direction, indicating that ruvA is the first gene in the operon. Dresser et al. [49] have also been unsuccessful in trans complementing ruvA and ruvB mutants obtained by allelic exchange. The ruvA and ruvB mutants obtained by our laboratory and by Dresser et al. [49] were derived independently by different means (transposon mutagenesis and gene disruption by allelic exchange), yet have nearly identical phenotypes. Thus it is likely that the lack of complementation observed in these studies is due to technical complications, as has been commonly observed in genetic studies involving infectious B. burgdorferi. We will continue our efforts to complement the ruvA and ruvB mutants in an attempt to fulfill the ‘molecular Koch's postulates’ on the roles of these genes in infectivity in immunocompetent mice and in vlsE recombination.

The current study along with those by Liveris et al. [31] and Dresser et al. [32] provide some insight into the mechanism of recombination in the vls antigenic variation system. The central role of RuvAB indicates that heteroduplex formation with branch migration is important in this process. The lack of a requirement for RecA [31],[32] is surprising. RecA provides two important functions in other microorganisms: ATP-dependent formation of RecA-single-stranded DNA nucleoprotein filaments that facilitate the homologous base pairing during heteroduplex formation [50]; and cleavage of LexA to activate the SOS response through its activity as a co-protease when bound to single-stranded DNA. As indicated above, B. burgdorferi lacks a recognizable LexA ortholog, so the latter function is likely to be unimportant (although co-protease activity is present in B. burgdorferi RecA). Liveris et al. [31] state that the apparent lack of effect of recA mutation on vlsE recombination indicates that homologous recombination mechanisms are not involved in this process. However, ‘templated’ vlsE sequence changes (those involving incorporation of silent cassette sequences) consistently occur at the same position as the optimal alignment between the silent cassette and vlsE; i.e., the observed vls silent cassette/vlsE recombinations are always homologous, and never nonhomologous [11]. vlsE recombination is induced during mammalian infection; it is possible that factor(s) that bind specifically to vls sequences and promote strand invasion and heteroduplex formation may be expressed under these conditions and hence fulfill a RecA-like (but site-specific) role. Such factor(s) have not been identified to date. Once a heteroduplex is formed, RuvAB may promote the migration of the heteroduplex branch point, thus extending the region of strand exchange. In a set of 126 vlsE variants that appeared to contain a single recombination event [11], the putative minimal recombination events ranged from 1 nt to 349 nt, with a median value of less than 5 nt. This result indicates that the strand replacement process is often interrupted quite soon after its initiation. The observed range of sequence identity between donor and recipient sequences flanking the region of sequence change was from 0 nt to 88 nt, with (remarkably) as little as 6 nt on one side or the other [11]. It is currently unknown whether the role of the RuvAB migrase is to promote heteroduplex formation in these regions of sequence identity (thus nucleating the strand exchange event), or whether it is also able to ‘drive’ the strand pairing through regions of sequence differences.

Gene conversion has been described as the predominant mechanism in other bacterial and protozoal antigenic variation systems, including those of relapsing fever Borrelia (e.g. B. hermsii), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Anaplasma marginale, Trypanosoma cruzi, and Babesia bovis [51],[52],[53],[54]. Lyme disease and relapsing fever Borrelia are closely related, and VlsE and the variable large protein (Vlp) antigenic variation proteins have some sequence similarity. However, in B. hermsii the gene conversion events result from homologous recombination within well-demarcated upstream homology sequences (UHS) and downstream homology sequences (DHS), resulting in replacement of nearly the entire expression site gene with a silent gene sequence [53],[55]; therefore it is different from the vls system both in terms of mechanism and gene conversion outcome. The N. gonorrhoeae pilE system, the A. marginale MSP2, and the B. bovis VESA1a systems each involve segmental gene conversion events utilizing multiple silent gene copies to produce highly variable pilin or surface protein sequences. The pilE system is dependent upon RecA and other recombination system proteins that are not required for vlsE recombination, as described in detail by Dresser et al. [32]. In A. marginale, the gene conversion event is almost always ‘anchored’ in a conserved region flanking the hypervariable region [56]. The mechanisms of B. bovis VESA1a recombination are not well characterized, but are likely to involve eukaryote-specific elements that will differ considerably from those present in the prokaryote B. burgdorferi. Thus, based on current knowledge, the vls system may represent a unique gene conversion process that is mechanistically dissimilar to other known antigenic variation systems.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All procedures involving mice conducted at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston were reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of that institution. All mouse studies conducted at the Tulane National Primate Research Center were reviewed and approved by its Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Bacterial strains and growth medium

The transformable, infectious Borrelia burgdorferi B31 clone 5A18NP1 was used for generation of all mutants. 5A18NP1 is a genetically modified clone in which plasmids lp28-4 and lp56 are missing and BBE02, encoding a putative restriction-modification enzyme, has been disrupted [33]. Borrelia burgdorferi B31 clone 5A8, containing all plasmids except lp28-1, was isolated previously from the low-passage strain B31 [15],[57] and was used as negative control in mouse inoculation experiments. All strains used in this study had undergone no more than two subcultures since clone isolation prior to infectivity studies. B. burgdorferi were grown at 34°C in 3% CO2 in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly II (BSK-II) medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics as described previously [58]. The in vitro growth rates of the ruvA and ruvB mutants and the parental strain 5A18 NP1 were determined by daily quantitation of organisms in triplicate cultures by dark-field microscopy. E. coli TOP10, a DH5α™-derived strain obtained from Invitrogen Corporation (Carlsbad, CA, USA), was used for the preparation of plasmids for electroporation into B. burgdorferi.

Inactivation of DNA recombination and repair genes

Genes putatively involved DNA recombination and repair were inactivated by transposon mediated mutagenesis as part of a transposon signature tagged mutagenesis (STM) study on-going in the laboratory. This study will be described in detail in another publication (Lin, T., L. Gao, C. Zhang, E. Odeh, and Norris, S.J., manuscript in preparation). Briefly, twelve independent mutant libraries, each having a unique 7 bp sequence tag, were created using modified versions of the suicide plasmid pMarGentKan. This plasmid was graciously provided by Dr. P. E. Stewart (Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MN) and is a modified version of pMarGent [59] in which a kanamycin resistance cassette (flaB::aph1) was inserted in the ‘backbone’ of the vector, outside the himar1-based transposable element and a flgB:aacC1 gene is inserted within the transposable element (P. E. Stewart, unpublished data). After insertion of unique sequence tags into pMarGentKan, 5 µg of each plasmid was electroporated into B. burgdorferi B31 using a modification of previously described methods [59],[60]. The transformants were incubated in BSK-II medium without antibiotics for recovery overnight hours and plated in solid BSK-II media with 200 µg/ml of kanamycin and 40 µg/ml of gentamicin as described previously [57]. Colonies were selected and cultured in liquid BSK-II medium until mid-log phase prior to addition of 15% (v/v) glycerol and storage at −70°C. The transposon insertion site was determined by restriction digestion of the Borrelia genomic DNA, plasmid rescue in E. coli, and sequencing as described previously [59]. Properties of the transposon mutants selected for this study are shown in Table 1.

Determination of plasmid content

The plasmid profiles of DNA recombination and repair mutants were determined by a microtiter plate-based PCR method as previously described [15] or by a multiplex PCR scheme followed by detection using Luminex® FlexMAP™ technology. The Luminex® procedure will be described in detail in another article (S. J. Norris, J. K. Howell, E. Odeh, T. Lin, and D. G. Edmondson, manuscript in preparation). Briefly, multiplex PCR reactions were performed to amplify plasmid-specific regions. The resultant PCR reactions were treated with exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Exo/SAP, U. S. Biologicals) to remove excess nucleotides and primers, and then subjected to allele specific primer extension (ASPE) in the presence of biotin-dCTP using primers specific for individual plasmid products. The 5′ end of the ASPE primers contains an xTAG® universal tag sequence and the 3′ end of the ASPE primers contains the plasmid-specific sequences. The 5′ universal tag sequence was hybridized to the complementary anti-tag sequence coupled to a particular xMAP® bead set and biotin labeled DNA was detected with PhycoLink® Streptavidin-R-Phycoerythrin (SAPE). Detection and analysis was carried out using the Luminex® 200™ System (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX), and samples were scored as plasmid positive or negative based on the median fluorescence intensity values for each probe set.

Mouse infection studies

Clones with transposon insertions in DNA recombination and repair genes were tested individually for infectivity in 4-week-old C3H/HeNHsd (wild type) by needle inoculation (Table 1). Mutant clones, the parental strain 5A18NP1, and clone 5A8 were cultured to mid-log phase, and groups of 4–5 mice were inoculated with 1×105 organisms subcutaneously at the base of the tail as described previously [57]. Skin biopsies were collected aseptically at day 4, 7, 14 post inoculation. The mice were sacrificed at day 28 post inoculation, and skin, tibiotarsal joint, heart, and urinary bladder were collected. The tissue specimens were cultured in 6 ml BSK II medium containing kanamycin and gentamicin at 34°C in 3% CO2. The cultures were checked for spirochetes by dark-field microscopy at 2 and 4 weeks, and positive cultures were diluted and subsurface plated in 0.7% solid BSKII –agarose medium to isolate individual colonies. For selected mutants, similar studies were performed in 5-week-old, female C3H.C-Prkdĉscid/ICRSmnHsd SCID mice (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN). For clarity, this mouse strain is referred to as C3H/scid in this article. Anti-VlsE responses were assessed by ELISA as described previously [61].

Tick inoculation studies

B. burgdorferi mutant and wild-type strains were grown in BSK-II medium that was supplemented with 6% rabbit serum (Pel-Freez Biologicals) and 45.4 µg/ml rifampicin, 193 µg/ml phosphomycin, 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin, 200 µg/ml kanamycin (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Gentamicin (Gibco) at 50 µg/ml was added to the mutant strain cultures only. Ixodes scapularis nymphal ticks from the Tulane National Primate Research Center tick colony were capillary fed with culture medium that contained the ruvA mutant, ruvB mutant, or the 5A18NP1 wild type B. burgdorferi, each at a concentration of about 9×107 cells/ml. Capillary feeding was performed by a procedure described previously [20]. Ticks were then allowed to rest for 21 to 25 days in a humidified environment at 22°C. Ten flat (unfed) nymphs from each group were surface disinfected and crushed in 30 µl of sterile PBS. Half of this volume was cultured in 5 ml of BSK II medium, supplemented with antibiotics as above, for a total of 12 weeks, and monitored weekly after the second week. . The remaining half was distributed on microscope slides for quantitation of spirochetes (see below).

The remaining flat ticks were placed on mice. Three 8–10 week-old C3H/HeN female mice were used for each B. burgdorferi strain, and each mouse received 10–12 nymphs. Engorged (fed) ticks (about 75% of the initial number) were collected within 6 days, and cleaned, crushed, and cultured or prepared for DFA as described above. All of the mice were euthanized 4 weeks after the ticks had dropped off, and heart, bladder, one ear, and one tibiotarsal joint were collected from each animal. In each case, half of the organ sample was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored and the other half was placed in culture for 8 weeks.

Immunofluorescence

A direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay was performed to evaluate survival of each B. burgdorferi strain in ticks as described previously [62]. Briefly, tick smears from flat and fed ticks (see above) were air-dried on glass slides, acetone fixed and stored at −20°C until DFA examination. Slides were incubated with 40 µl of a 1:10 dilution of fluorescein-labeled anti-Borrelia species antibody (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MD)) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Following incubation, the slides were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and examined by fluorescence microscopy (magnification, 600X). For unfed ticks and for each spirochetal strain, spirochetes in 10 microscope fields were counted in each of 10 ticks per strain. For fed ticks, between 5 and 10 fields were counted in 24–26 ticks per strain. The mean number of spirochetes per field and the standard deviations are presented in Table 4. Statistical significance (p<0.05) was assessed by ANOVA.

RFLP analysis and sequencing of amplified vlsE cassette regions

As a screen for vlsE sequence variation, cultures obtained from mouse infections were subjected to vlsE cassette region amplification followed by RFLP analysis. Five µl of unpurified culture was used as the DNA template. The vlsE expression cassette was amplified by using primers 4066 and 4120 [6] and the Phusion™ High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes, Inc. Woburn, Massachusetts, USA). PCR reactions were performed in volumes of 50 µl containing 10 µl of 5× HF buffer with 7.5 mM MgCl2, 1 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, 1 µl of 25 mM primers, and 1 U of Phusion™ High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase. PCR reactions were performed in a Eppendorf Mastercycler® thermocycler (Foster City, California, USA), using the following conditions; 98°C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of 1) denaturation at 98°C for 10 sec, 2) annealing at 61°C for 20 sec, and 3) extension at 72°C for 45 sec and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. For RFLP analysis, 10 µl of PCR product was digested with 2.5 U of the restriction endonuclease HphI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) for 2 hrs at 37°C in 10×NEBuffer 4. The digests were separated in a 2% (w/v) agarose gel at a 100V constant voltage for 1.5 hrs in the presence of ethidium bromide. The Hi-Lo™ DNA marker (Bionexus, Oakland, CA) was used as a molecular size marker. Gels were imaged with UV light illumination.

For sequence determination, the PCR products from individual clones were amplified as described above, purified using the Qiaquick® PCR purification kit (Qiagen), and sequenced on both strands at the High-Throughput Genomics Unit (Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle), using the same primers used for PCR amplification. Each DNA sequence was compared with their corresponding chromatographs and the parental vlsE sequence to verify the quality and accuracy of the sequence data.

vlsE sequence analysis

The sequence of the vlsE cassette region of clone 5A18NP1 (GenBank GQ369288) is identical to that of B. burgdorferi B31-5A3, from which the vlsE sequence (U76405) was derived initially [6]. All B. burgdorferi clones and the GenBank numbers corresponding to their vlsE cassette region sequences are listed in Table S3. For simplicity, the clone names refer to all clones resulting from T11P01A01 infection as ruvA1 and all T03TC051 derivatives as ruvB1. All clones resulting from infection with the parental clone are given the prefix 5A18NP1. The clone names (e.g. RuvA1SD14M1S2) are in the following format: infecting strain name; S indicates C3H/scid mice (all others are C3H/HeN mice); D7, D14 or D28 = 7, 14 or 28 days post inoculation; mouse number (M1, M2, etc.); S, E, J, H, B = skin, ear, tibiotarsal joint, heart, and bladder, respectively; and the clone number from that tissue. The clone numbers and their GenBank accession numbers are also provided at the website http://www.uth.tmc.edu/pathology/borreli​a/.

vlsE sequence analysis of variants was performed as described previously [11]. The output of this Excel®/Visual Basic-based program is a color-coded map of possible vlsE recombination events, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure S2. The minimum and maximum deduced regions of recombination were determined by analyzing the longest contiguous recombination event in the variant sequence. The relationships among clones with different vlsE sequences were displayed graphically as phylogenetic trees. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the online phylogenetic program Phylogeny.fr [63], based on the aligned parental and variant vlsE sequences.

Sensitivity to UV radiation and mitomycin C

The ruvA mutant T11P01A01 and the parental strain 5A18NP1 were tested for UV sensitivity using a modification of the method described by Miller, et al. Cultures were grown to a density of 1×107 organisms/ml. The spirochetes were centrifuged and resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of 1×108 organisms/ml, and 0.1 ml of the suspensions was rapidly aliquoted into 24-well plates. The bacteria were irradiated with UV light (254 nm) using a Spectrolinker XL-1000 UV cross-linker (Spectronics, Westbury, N.Y.) at doses of 0, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, 7.5 and 9.0 mJ/cm2. The UV treated bacteria were protected from room light, diluted in BSK-II and cultured in BSK-II plates in duplicate or triplicate, at a concentration of 100 organisms per plate. The colonies were counted after 2 weeks incubation.

For determination of mitomycin C sensitivity, fresh cultures of Borrelia were grown to mid-log phase and diluted to a density of 1×107 organisms/ml. Mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added to 1 ml cultures at final concentrations of 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 480, 960, 2000, and 4000 ng/ml, and the cultures were incubated at 34°C in 3% CO2. The concentration of motile spirochetes was determined by dark-field microscopy at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours. At 14 hours, the cultures were serially diluted in BSK-II to obtain concentrations 1000 cells/ml, and 0.1 ml portions of each dilution were cultured in BSKII plates with antibiotics as described above. Each culture was plated in duplicate and incubated 7–10 days at 34°C. Mitomycin C sensitivity was measured by counting the surviving colonies. Untreated cells grown in an identical manner served as controls.

RT-PCR analysis of ruvA operon

RNA was isolated from B. burgdorferi using RNA-Bee® (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, Texas). Borrelia cultures were grown to a concentration of approximately 5×107 organisms/ml. Spirochetes from 1 ml of culture were sedimented by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 ml of RNA-Bee®, and RNA isolation was carried out as per manufacturer's instructions. The resulting RNA was quantitated by UV spectroscopy, checked visually on an agarose gel, and then treated with DNase I (RNase-free, New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer's suggested procedure. Reverse transcription was performed using 200 ng of RNA and primers specific to the ruvA operon following the two-step protocol found in the Enhanced Avian HS RT-PCR kit from Sigma-Aldrich. Subsequent PCR reactions used two µl of the resultant cDNA, 25 µM of specific primers and 2X PCR mix from New England Biolabs. Primer sequences and reaction conditions are shown in Table S2.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Gene arrangement and transcription patterns of the ruvAB locus in the parental clone 5A18NP1 and the ruvA mutant T11P01A01. (A) The ruvAB locus, with presumed cotranscribed genes queA and pfpB. The location of the transposon insertion site in the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 is shown. (B) RT-PCR analysis of transcription of the ruvAB locus of 5A18NP1 and T11P01A01, using the primer pairs shown in (A). RT = with reverse transcriptase, no RT = without reverse transcriptase.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.s001

(0.26 MB PDF)

Figure S2.

Detailed analysis of the possible recombination events in the vlsE variant clonotypes isolated 28 days post inoculation of C3H/HeN mice with the ruvA mutant T11P01A01 and the ruvB mutant T03TC051. The method of analysis is described in detail in Ref. [11]. Briefly, the horizontal colored bars represent regions of each silent cassette (vls2 to vls16, top to bottom) that may have contributed to sequence changes found in the variant clone. Dark regions in each bar correspond to the regions of sequence changes, whereas the lighter portion of each bar represents the maximal possible region of that silent cassette that could have been exchanged into vlsE to produce the observed sequence change. The locations and silent cassette sources of the most likely recombination events are marked by a red dashed box.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.s002

(0.65 MB PDF)

Figure S3.

Reduced vlsE sequence diversity generated following inoculation of C3H/HeN mice with the ruvB mutant T03TC051. Clones were isolated from three C3H/HeN mice 28 days post inoculation with 105 T03TC051. The vlsE cassette region sequences of each clone were optimally aligned and then analyzed for sequence diversity using a phylogenetic tree program. The groups of clones isolated from each mouse and their tissue source are indicated. Trees are rooted with the 5A18NP1 parental vlsE sequence.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.s003

(0.08 MB PDF)

Table S1.

The B. burgdorferi ruvA mutant T11P01A01 and the ruvB mutant T03TC051 exhibit decreased vlsE sequence variation during infection of C3H/HeN and C3H/SCID mice.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.s004

(0.01 MB PDF)

Table S2.

Primers used in RT-PCR of the ruvAB locus.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.s005

(0.01 MB PDF)

Table S3.

B. burgdorferi isolates generated in this study.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000679.s006

(0.43 MB PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank D. Scott Samuels for providing the shuttle vector pKFSS1, Jerrilyn K.Howell for helpful suggestions and assistance with the animal studies, and Douglas J. Botkin for advice on vlsE sequence analysis. We also thank Ashley R. Dresser, Pierre-Olivier Hardy, and George Chaconas for sharing their results prior to publication.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TL LG DGE MTP SJN. Performed the experiments: TL LG DGE MBJ. Analyzed the data: TL LG DGE MBJ MTP SJN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TL LG SJN. Wrote the paper: TL DGE MTP SJN.

References

  1. 1. Steere AC, Coburn J, Glickstein L (2004) The emergence of Lyme disease. J Clin Invest 113: 1093–1101.
  2. 2. Lane RS, Piesman J, Burgdorfer W (1991) Lyme borreliosis: relation of its causative agent to its vectors and hosts in North America and Europe. Annu Rev Entomol 36: 587–609.
  3. 3. van der Woude MW, Bäumler AJ (2004) Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 581–611.
  4. 4. Wisniewski-Dye F, Vial L (2008) Phase and antigenic variation mediated by genome modifications. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 94: 493–515.
  5. 5. Wang D, Botkin DJ, Norris SJ (2003) Characterization of the vls antigenic variation loci of the Lyme disease spirochaetes Borrelia garinii Ip90 and Borrelia afzelii ACAI. Mol Microbiol 47: 1407–1417.
  6. 6. Zhang JR, Hardham JM, Barbour AG, Norris SJ (1997) Antigenic variation in Lyme disease borreliae by promiscuous recombination of VMP-like sequence cassettes. Cell 89: 275–285.
  7. 7. Wang G, van Dam AP, Dankert J (2001) Analysis of a VMP-like sequence (vls) locus in Borrelia garinii and Vls homologues among four Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 199: 39–45.
  8. 8. Kawabata H, Myouga F, Inagaki Y, Murai N, Watanabe H (1998) Genetic and immunological analyses of Vls (VMP-like sequences) of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microb Pathog 24: 155–166.
  9. 9. Göttner G, Schulte-Spechtel U, Wilske B (2004) Heterogeneity of the immunodominant surface protein VlsE among the three genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi pathogenic for humans. Int J Med Microbiol 293: Suppl 37172–173.
  10. 10. Zhang JR, Norris SJ (1998) Genetic variation of the Borrelia burgdorferi gene vlsE involves cassette-specific, segmental gene conversion. Infect Immun 66: 3698–3704.
  11. 11. Coutte L, Botkin DJ, Gao L, Norris SJ (2009) Detailed analysis of sequence changes occurring during vlsE antigenic variation in the mouse model of Borrelia burgdorferi infection. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000293. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000293.
  12. 12. Eicken C, Sharma V, Klabunde T, Lawrenz MB, Hardham JM, et al. (2002) Crystal structure of Lyme disease variable surface antigen VlsE of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Biol Chem 277: 21691–21696.
  13. 13. McDowell JV, Sung SY, Hu LT, Marconi RT (2002) Evidence that the variable regions of the central domain of VlsE are antigenic during infection with Lyme disease spirochetes. Infect Immun 70: 4196–4203.
  14. 14. Labandeira-Rey M, Baker E, Skare J (2001) Decreased infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 is associated with loss of linear plasmid 25 or 28-1. Infect Immun 69: 446–455.
  15. 15. Purser JE, Norris SJ (2000) Correlation between plasmid content and infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13865–13870.
  16. 16. Grimm D, Eggers CH, Caimano MJ, Tilly K, Stewart PE, et al. (2004) Experimental assessment of the roles of linear plasmids lp25 and lp28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi throughout the infectious cycle. Infect Immun 72: 5938–5946.
  17. 17. Labandeira-Rey M, Seshu J, Skare JT (2003) The absence of linear plasmid 25 or 28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi dramatically alters the kinetics of experimental infection via distinct mechanisms. Infect Immun 71: 4608–4613.
  18. 18. Purser JE, Lawrenz MB, Caimano MJ, Howell JK, Radolf JD, et al. (2003) A plasmid-encoded nicotinamidase (PncA) is essential for infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi in a mammalian host. Mol Microbiol 48: 753–764.
  19. 19. Bankhead T, Chaconas G (2007) The role of VlsE antigenic variation in the Lyme disease spirochete: persistence through a mechanism that differs from other pathogens. Mol Microbiol 65: 1547–1558.
  20. 20. Indest KJ, Howell JK, Jacobs MB, Scholl-Meeker D, Norris SJ, et al. (2001) Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi vlsE gene expression and recombination in the tick vector. Infect Immun 69: 7083–7090.
  21. 21. Nosbisch LK, de Silva AM (2007) Lack of detectable variation at Borrelia burgdorferi vlsE locus in ticks. J Med Entomol 44: 168–170.
  22. 22. Zhang JR, Norris SJ (1998) Kinetics and in vivo induction of genetic variation of vlsE in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 66: 3689–3697.
  23. 23. Norris SJ (2006) Antigenic variation with a twist - the Borrelia story. Mol Microbiol 60: 1319–1322.
  24. 24. Embers ME, Liang FT, Howell JK, Jacobs MB, Purcell JE, et al. (2007) Antigenicity and recombination of VlsE, the antigenic variation protein of Borrelia burgdorferi, in rabbits, a host putatively resistant to long-term infection with this spirochete. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 50: 421–429.
  25. 25. Crother TR, Champion CI, Wu XY, Blanco DR, Miller JN, et al. (2003) Antigenic composition of Borrelia burgdorferi during infection of SCID mice. Infect Immun 71: 3419–3428.
  26. 26. Crother TR, Champion CI, Whitelegge JP, Aguilera R, Wu XY, et al. (2004) Temporal analysis of the antigenic composition of Borrelia burgdorferi during infection in rabbit skin. Infect Immun 72: 5063–5072.
  27. 27. Mehr IJ, Seifert HS (1998) Differential roles of homologous recombination pathways in Neisseria gonorrhoeae pilin antigenic variation, DNA transformation and DNA repair. Mol Microbiol 30: 697–710.
  28. 28. Skaar EP, Lazio MP, Seifert HS (2002) Roles of the recJ and recN genes in homologous recombination and DNA repair pathways of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 184: 919–927.
  29. 29. Kline KA, Sechman EV, Skaar EP, Seifert HS (2003) Recombination, repair and replication in the pathogenic Neisseriae: the 3 R's of molecular genetics of two human-specific bacterial pathogens. Mol Microbiol 50: 3–13.
  30. 30. Sechman EV, Kline KA, Seifert HS (2006) Loss of both Holliday junction processing pathways is synthetically lethal in the presence of gonococcal pilin antigenic variation. Mol Microbiol 61: 185–193.
  31. 31. Liveris D, Mulay V, Sandigursky S, Schwartz I (2008) Borrelia burgdorferi vlsE antigenic variation is not mediated by RecA. Infect Immun 76: 4009–4018.
  32. 32. Dresser AR, Hardy P-O, Chaconas G (2009) Investigation of the role of DNA replication, recombination and repair genes on antigenic switching at the vlsE locus in Borrelia burgdorferi. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000680. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000680.
  33. 33. Kawabata H, Norris SJ, Watanabe H (2004) BBE02 disruption mutants of Borrelia burgdorferi B31 have a highly transformable, infectious phenotype. Infect Immun 72: 7147–7154.
  34. 34. Boursaux-Eude C, Margarita D, Belfaiza J, Old IG, Saints Girons I (1998) Homologues of helicase genes priA and ruvAB of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme borreliosis agent. Res Microbiol 149: 235–245.
  35. 35. Frank KL, Bundle SF, Kresge ME, Eggers CH, Samuels DS (2003) aadA confers streptomycin resistance in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol 185: 6723–6727.
  36. 36. Iwasaki H, Takahagi M, Nakata A, Shinagawa H (1992) Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins specifically interact with Holliday junctions and promote branch migration. Genes Dev 6: 2214–2220.
  37. 37. Parsons CA, Tsaneva I, Lloyd RG, West SC (1992) Interaction of Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins with synthetic Holliday junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 5452–5456.
  38. 38. Shiba T, Iwasaki H, Nakata A, Shinagawa H (1991) SOS-inducible DNA repair proteins, RuvA and RuvB, of Escherichia coli: functional interactions between RuvA and RuvB for ATP hydrolysis and renaturation of the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 8445–8449.
  39. 39. Connolly B, Parsons CA, Benson FE, Dunderdale HJ, Sharples GJ, et al. (1991) Resolution of Holliday junctions in vitro requires the Escherichia coli ruvC gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 6063–6067.
  40. 40. Aravind L, Makarova KS, Koonin EV (2000) Holliday junction resolvases and related nucleases: identification of new families, phyletic distribution and evolutionary trajectories. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 3417–3432.
  41. 41. Lloyd RG, Benson FE, Shurvinton CE (1984) Effect of ruv mutations on recombination and DNA repair in Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet 194: 303–309.
  42. 42. Stacey KA, Lloyd RG (1976) Isolation of Rec2 mutants from an F-prime merodiploid strain of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Gen Genet 143: 223–232.
  43. 43. Otsuji N, Iyehara H, Hideshima Y (1974) Isolation and characterization of an Escherichia coli ruv mutant which forms nonseptate filaments after low doses of ultraviolet light irradiation. J Bacteriol 117: 337–344.
  44. 44. Courcelle J, Hanawalt PC (2001) Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8196–8202.
  45. 45. Pavel P, Khil R, Camerini-Otero D (2002) Over 1000 genes are involved in the DNA damage response of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 44: 89–105.
  46. 46. Goodman MF (2002) Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Ann Rev Biochem 71: 17–50.
  47. 47. Fraser CM, Casjens S, Huang WM, Sutton GG, Clayton R, et al. (1997) Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390: 580–586.
  48. 48. Liveris D, Mulay V, Schwartz I (2004) Functional properties of Borrelia burgdorferi recA. J Bacteriol 186: 2275–2280.
  49. 49. Dresser AR, Hardy P-O, Chaconas G (2009) Investigation of the role of DNA replication, recombination and repair genes in antigenic switching at the vlsE locus in Borrelia burgdorferi: an essential role for the RuvAB branch migrase. Submitted.
  50. 50. Wang TF, Chen LT, Wang AH (2008) Right or left turn? RecA family protein filaments promote homologous recombination through clockwise axial rotation. Bioessays 30: 48–56.
  51. 51. Allred DR, Al-Khedery B (2004) Antigenic variation and cytoadhesion in Babesia bovis and Plasmodium falciparum: different logics achieve the same goal. Mol Biochem Parasitol 134: 27–35.
  52. 52. Palmer GH, Brayton KA (2007) Gene conversion is a convergent strategy for pathogen antigenic variation. Trends Parasitol 23: 408–413.
  53. 53. Dai Q, Restrepo BI, Porcella SF, Raffel SJ, Schwan TG, et al. (2006) Antigenic variation by Borrelia hermsii occurs through recombination between extragenic repetitive elements on linear plasmids. Mol Microbiol 60: 1329–1343.
  54. 54. Barbour AG, Restrepo BI (2000) Antigenic variation in vector-borne pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 6: 449–457.
  55. 55. Barbour AG, Dai Q, Restrepo BI, Stoenner HG, Frank SA (2006) Pathogen escape from host immunity by a genome program for antigenic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18290–18295.
  56. 56. Futse JE, Brayton KA, Knowles DP Jr, Palmer GH (2005) Structural basis for segmental gene conversion in generation of Anaplasma marginale outer membrane protein variants. Mol Microbiol 57: 212–221.
  57. 57. Norris SJ, Howell JK, Garza SA, Ferdows MS, Barbour AG (1995) High- and low-infectivity phenotypes of clonal populations of in vitro-cultured Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 63: 2206–2212.
  58. 58. Barbour AG (1984) Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes. Yale J Biol Med 57: 521–525.
  59. 59. Stewart PE, Hoff J, Fischer E, Krum JG, Rosa PA (2004) Genome-wide transposon mutagenesis of Borrelia burgdorferi for identification of phenotypic mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 5973–5979.
  60. 60. Samuels DS (1995) Electrotransformation of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Methods Mol Biol 47: 253–259.
  61. 61. Lawrenz MB, Hardham JM, Owens RT, Nowakowski J, Steere AC, et al. (1999) Human antibody responses to VlsE antigenic variation protein of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol 37: 3997–4004.
  62. 62. Jacobs MB, Purcell JE, Philipp MT (2003) Ixodes scapularis ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from Louisiana are competent to transmit Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme borreliosis. J Med Entomol 40: 964–967.
  63. 63. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, et al. (2008) Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W465–469.